No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Responsiveness to Coethnics and Cominorities: Evidence from an Audit Experiment of State Legislators
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2023
Abstract
How do legislators respond to coethnic and cominority constituents? We conduct an audit study of all state legislators to explore white legislators’ responsiveness to different minority groups and minority group legislators’ responsiveness to each other. Black and Latino Americans currently make up about one-third of the overall U.S. population and an even larger share of some state populations. In light of this growing diversification of the American electorate, legislators may have incentives to appeal to a broad racial constituency. In our experiment, state legislators are randomly assigned to receive an email from a white, Black, or Latino constituent. Our findings suggest a lack of legislators’ discrimination, on average, against Black relative to white constituents. Instead, we find that all legislators, on average, respond more to both white and Black constituents relative to Latinos. The evidence suggests that Black legislators do not exhibit coethnic solidarity toward their Black constituents or cominority solidarity toward their Latino constituents; however, Latinos do exhibit coethnic and cominority solidarity (though there are too few Latino legislators to definitively establish this claim). We also estimate effects among white legislators by party and racial composition of districts in order to provide suggestive evidence for white legislators’ intrinsic vs. strategic motivations.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Race, Ethnicity, and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association
References
Adida, CL, Davenport, LD and McClendon, G (2016) Ethnic cueing across minorities: a survey experiment on candidate evaluation in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly 80, 815–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, L (2000) Is Latina/o identity a racial identity? In Gracia, JJE and DeGreiff, P (eds), Hispanics/Latinos in the United States: Ethnicity, Race, and Rights. New York: Routledge, pp. 23–44.Google Scholar
Alt, J, Bueno de Mesquita, E and Rose, S (2011) Disentangling accountability and competence in elections: evidence from U.S. Term limits. The Journal of Politics 73, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baekgaard, M and George, B (2018) Equal access to the top? Representative bureaucracy and politicians’ recruitment preferences for top administrative staff. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28, 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, A (2017) Racial Coalition Building in Local Elections: Elite Cues and Cross-Ethnic Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M and Mullainathan, S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review 94, 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, R Jr, Crabtree, C, Holbein, JB and Monson, JQ (2021) Are Americans less likely to reply to emails from Black people relative to White people? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bratton, KA and Haynie, KL (1999) Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: the effects of gender and race. The Journal of Politics 61, 658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, KA, Haynie, KL and Reingold, B (2007) Agenda setting and African American women in state legislatures. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28, 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, KA, Haynie, KL and Reingold, B (2008) Gender, race, ethnicity and representation: the changing landscape of legislative diversity. The Book of States 40, 73–79.Google Scholar
Broockman, DE (2011) Black politicians are more intrinsically motivated to advance Blacks’ interests: a field experiment manipulating political incentives. American Journal of Political Science 57, 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, DM and Broockman, DE (2011) Do politicians racially discriminate against constituents? A field experiment on state legislators. American Journal of Political Science 55, 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, DM and Crabtree, C (2017) Moving beyond measurement: adapting audit studies to test bias-reducing interventions. Journal of Experimental Political Science 4, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, DM, Karpowitz, CF and Pope, JC (2012a) A field experiment on legislators’ home styles: service versus policy. The Journal of Politics 74, 474–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, DM, Karpowitz, CF and Pope, JC (2012b) A field experiment on legislators’ home styles: service versus policy. The Journal of Politics 74, 474–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, DT (1999) Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casarez Lemi, D (2018) Identity and coalitions in a multiracial era: how state legislators navigate race and ethnicity. Politics, Groups, and Identities 6, 725–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casellas, JP (2010) Latino Representation in State Houses and Congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casellas, JP and Leal, D (2010) Minority representation in the US congress. In Bird, K, Saalfeld, T and Wüst, AM (eds), The Political Representation of Immigrants and Minorities: Voters, Parties and Parliaments in Liberal Democracies, Chapter 8. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 183–206.Google Scholar
Casellas, JP and Leal, DL (2013) Partisanship or population? House and senate immigration votes in the 109th and 110th congresses. Politics, Groups, and Identities 1, 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, MD and Jenkins, JA (2001) Race and the representation of Blacks’ interests during reconstruction. Political Research Quarterly 54, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comenetz, J (2016) Frequently occurring surnames in the 2010 Census. United States Census Bureau 1–8. Accessed online: https://www2.census.gov/topics/genealogy/2010surnames/surnames.pdf.Google Scholar
Costa, M (2017) How responsive are political elites? A meta-analysis of experiments on public officials. Journal of Experimental Political Science 4, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, M and Schaffner, BF (2018) How gender conditions the way citizens evaluate and engage with their representatives. Political Research Quarterly 71, 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, MC (1995) Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinesen, PT, Dahl, M and Schiøoler, M (2021) When are legislators responsive to ethnic minorities? Testing the role of electoral incentives and candidate selection for mitigating ethnocentric responsiveness. The American Political Science Review 115, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, S (2002) Preferable descriptive representatives: will just any woman, black, or Latino do? American Political Science Review 96, 729–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, KL and Glick, DM (2017) Does race affect access to government services? An experiment exploring street-level bureaucrats and access to public housing. American Journal of Political Science 61, 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enos, RD (2014) Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 3699–3704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enos, RD (2016) What the demolition of public housing teaches Us about the impact of racial threat on political behavior. American Journal of Political Science 60, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espino, R, Leal, DL and Meier, KJ (2008) Latino Politics: Identity, Mobilization, and Representation. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, RF (1978) Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Fenno, RF (2003) Going Home: Black Representatives and Their Constituents. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, LR, Garcia, JA, Hero, RE, Jones-Correa, M, Martinez-Ebers, V and Segura, GM (2011) Latinos in the New Millennium: An almanac of Opinion, Behavior, and Policy Preferences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaddis, SM (2017) Racial/ethnic perceptions from hispanic names: selecting names to test for discrimination. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 3, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell-Redman, M, Visalvanich, N, Crabtree, C and Fariss, CJ (2018) It’s all about race: how state legislators respond to immigrant constituents. Political Research Quarterly 71, 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giger, N, Lanz, S and de Vries, C (2020) The motivational basis of constituency work: how intrinsic and extrinsic motivations interact. Political Science Research and Methods 8, 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giulietti, C, Tonin, M and Vlassopoulos, M (2019) Racial discrimination in local public services: a field experiment in the United States. Journal of the European Economic Association 17, 165–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, SK and Hopkins, DJ (2020) Past place, present prejudice: the impact of adolescent racial context on white racial attitudes. The Journal of Politics 82, 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, JD and Newman, B (2008) Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, CR (2005) Disentangling constituency and legislator effects in legislative representation: Black legislators or Black districts? Social Science Quarterly 86, 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, CR (2011) Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, CR, Mangum, M and Martin, C (2007) Race, political empowerment, and constituency service: descriptive representation and the hiring of African-American congressional staff. Polity 39, 449–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, AL, Reuning, K and Whitesell, A (2023) The party replies: examining local party responsiveness to prospective campaign volunteers. Political Research Quarterly 76, 931–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harden, JJ (2013) Multidimensional responsiveness: the determinants of legislators’ representational priorities. Legislative Studies Quarterly 38, 155–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, PJ and Sears, DO (2002) The symbolic racism 2000 scale. Political Psychology 23, 253–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, RE (1992) Latinos and the US Political System: Two-Tiered Pluralism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hero, RE and Preuhs, RP (2010) Black-Latino political relationships: policy voting in the U.S. House of representatives. American Politics Research 38, 531–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, RE and Tolbert, CJ (1995) Latinos and substantive representation in the U.S. House of representatives: direct, indirect, or nonexistent? American Journal of Political Science 39, 640–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, M (1990) Legislative responsiveness to Black constituents in three deep south states. The Journal of Politics 52, 740–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L (2023) What is ‘Race’ in algorithmic discrimination on the basis of race? Journal of Moral Philosophy 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20234369
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, DA, Gell-Redman, M, Crabtree, C, Krishnaswami, N, Rodenberger, D and Monge, G (2020) Persistent bias among local election officials. Journal of Experimental Political Science 7, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, CR (2022) Home Field Advantage: Roots, Reelection, and Representation in the Modern Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, CR and Rouse, SM (2023) Local candidate roots and electoral advantages in US state legislatures. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 23, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel-Trummel, ML and Schachter, A (2019) Does shared social disadvantage cause Black-Latino political commonality? Journal of Experimental Political Science 6, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S and Hahn, KS (2007) Natural disasters in Black and White: how racial cues influenced public response to Hurricane Katrina.” Unpublished Paper.Google Scholar
Janusz, A and Lajevardi, N (2016) Differential responsiveness: do legislators discriminate against hispanics? Technical report, Working Paper, Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Jones, JR (2017) Racing through the halls of congress: the ‘Black Nod’ as an adaptive strategy for surviving in a raced institution. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 14, 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, JR (2022) Racism and inequality in congress. PS: Political Science & Politics 55, 283–285.Google Scholar
Jones-Correa, M (2011) Commonalities, competition and linked fate. In Telles, E, Sawyer, MQ and Rivera-Salgado, G (eds), Just Neighbors? Research on African American and Latino Relations in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 63–95.Google Scholar
Juenke, EG and Preuhs, RR (2012) Irreplaceable legislators? Rethinking minority representatives in the new century. American Journal of Political Science 56, 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, KM (2003) Cracks in the rainbow: group commonality as a basis for Latino and African-American political coalitions. Political Research Quarterly 56, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, DR and Sanders, LM (1996) Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirgios, EL, Rai, A, Chang, EH and Milkman, KL (2022) When seeking help, women and racial/ethnic minorities benefit from explicitly stating their identity. Nature Human Behaviour 6, 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J (1999) Should Blacks represent Blacks and women represent women? A contingent “Yes”. The Journal of Politics 61, 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J (2003) Rethinking representation. The American Political Science Review 97, 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuoka, N (2008) Defining the group: Latino identity and political participation. American Politics Research 36, 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, DR (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McClain, PD, Johnson Carew, JD, Walton, E Jr and Watts, CS (2009) Group membership, group identity, and group consciousness: measures of racial identity in American politics? Annual Review of Political Science 12, 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClendon, G (2012) Ethics of using public officials as field experiment subjects. Newsletter of the APSA Experimental Section 3, 13–20.Google Scholar
Mendez, M (2014) Who represents the interests of undocumented Latinos? A field experiment of state legislators. Technical report, Working Paper, University of Southern California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez, MS and Grose, CR (2018) Doubling down: inequality in responsiveness and the policy preferences of elected officials. Legislative Studies Quarterly 43, 457–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minta, MD (2011) Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Miratrix, LW, Sekhon, JS and Yu, B (2013) Adjusting treatment effect estimates by post-stratification in randomized experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 75, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naurin, E and Öhberg, P (2021) Ethics in elite experiments: a perspective of officials and voters. British Journal of Political Science 51, 890–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, RP (2005) Descriptive representation, legislative leadership, and direct democracy: Latino influence on English only laws in the states, 1984–2002. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, RP (2007) Descriptive representation as a mechanism to mitigate policy backlash: Latino incorporation and welfare policy in the American states. Political Research Quarterly 60, 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, RR (2006) The conditional effects of minority descriptive representation: Black legislators and policy influence in the American states. The Journal of Politics 68, 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, RR and Hero, RE (2011) A different kind of representation: Black and Latino descriptive representation and the role of ideological cuing. Political Research Quarterly 64, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, SM (2013) Latinos in the Legislative Process: Interests and Influence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, GR and Masuoka, N (2010) Brown-utility heuristic? The presence and contributing factors of Latino linked fate. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 32, 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schildkraut, DJ (2017) White attitudes about descriptive representation in the US: the roles of identity, discrimination, and linked fate. Politics, Groups, and Identities 5, 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolewska, M, McKee, R and Campbell, R (2018) Explaining motivation to represent: how does descriptive representation lead to substantive representation of racial and ethnic minorities? West European Politics 41, 1237–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, CM (1993) Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, W (2003) “The “Race” to theorize education: who is my neighbor? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, DM and Sanders, BK (2020) Gender differences in legislator responsiveness. Perspectives on Politics 18, 1017–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, VC (2016) Twists of Fate: Multiracial Coalitions and Minority Representation in the US House of Representatives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitby, KJ (1997) The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitby, KJ and Krause, GA (2001) Race, issue heterogeneity and public policy: the republican revolution in the 104th US congress and the representation of African-American policy interests. British Journal of Political Science 31, 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, AR, Nathan, NL and Faller, JK (2015) What do I need to vote? Bureaucratic discretion and discrimination by local election officials. American Political Science Review 109, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, IK (2007) When race matters and when it doesn’t: racial group differences in response to racial cues. American Political Science Review 101, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, BC (2014) Perceptions of commonality and Latino–Black, Latino–White relations in a multiethnic United States. Political Research Quarterly 67, 905–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittel, T, Louwerse, T, Pedersen, HH and Schakel, W (2021) Should we conduct correspondence study field experiments with political elites? International Political Science Review 44, 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Burgos and Rubio supplementary material
Rivera-Burgos and Rubio supplementary material
PDF
100.8 KB