Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:00:40.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polyethersulfone/Graphene Oxide Ultrafiltration Membranes from Solutions in Ionic Liquid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2017

Dinesh. K. Mahalingam
Affiliation:
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division (BESE), 23955-6900 Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
DooLi. Kim
Affiliation:
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division (BESE), 23955-6900 Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
Suzana. P. Nunes*
Affiliation:
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division (BESE), 23955-6900 Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
Get access

Abstract

Novel high flux polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration membranes were fabricated by incorporating different amounts of graphene oxide (GO) sheets to PES as nanofillers. The membranes were prepared from solutions in 50/50 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium-diethylphosphate/N,N-dimethyl formamide. It was observed that the water permeance increased from 550 to 800 L m-2h-1bar-1, with incorporation of 1 wt% GO, keeping a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of approximately 32-34 kg mol-1. Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy images of GO/PES membranes showed the formation of ultrathin selective layer unlike pristine membranes. Contact angle measurements confirmed the increase of hydrophilicity, by increasing the GO concentration. The rejection of humic acid and bovine serum albumin was demonstrated. The mechanical properties were improved, compared with the pristine membranes. The performance was just above the trade-off relationship between permeance and separation factor for PES membranes reported in the literature.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Livazovic, S., Li, Z., Behzad, A.R., Peinemann, K.V. and Nunes, S.P., J. Membr. Sci. 490, 282 (2015).Google Scholar
Kim, D., Salazar, O.R. and Nunes, S.P., Green Chemistry 18, 5151 (2016).Google Scholar
Kim, D., Le, N.L. and Nunes, S.P., J. Membr. Sci. 520, 540 (2016).Google Scholar
Kim, D., Moreno, N. and Nunes, S.P., Polym. Chem. 7, 113 (2016).Google Scholar
Xing, D.Y., Peng, N. and Chung, T.-S., J. Membr. Sci. 380, 87 (2011).Google Scholar
Madhavan, P., Sougrat, R., Behzad, A.R., Peinemann, K.-V. and Nunes, S.P., J. Membr. Sci. 492, 568 (2015).Google Scholar
Chisca, S., Torsello, M., Avanzato, M., Xie, Y., Boi, C. and Nunes, S.P., Polymer.Google Scholar
Van Der Bruggen, B., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 114, 630 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akbari, A., Sheath, P., Martin, S.T., Shinde, D.B., Shaibani, M., Banerjee, P.C., Tkacz, R., Bhattacharyya, D. and Majumder, M., Nat. Commun. 7 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J., Wang, J., Hou, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, J. and Van der Bruggen, B., J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 6776 (2017).Google Scholar
Duan, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. and Liu, J., Appl. Surf. Sci. 355, 436 (2015).Google Scholar
Zhu, J., Tian, M., Hou, J., Wang, J., Lin, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, J. and Van Der Bruggen, B., J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 1980 (2016).Google Scholar
Dreyer, D.R., Park, S., Bielawski, C.W. and Ruoff, R.S., Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 228 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUMERS, W. and Offeman, R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1339 (1958).Google Scholar
Mehta, A. and Zydney, A.L., J. Membr. Sci. 249, 245 (2005).Google Scholar