Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:16:40.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responsible Leadership with Chinese Characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2024

Qing Qu*
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Pingping Fu
Affiliation:
Nottingham University Business School China, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China
Yu Tu
Affiliation:
School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
Masoud Shadnam
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Management and Economics (GSME), Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Qing Qu (quq@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn)

Abstract

Responsible leadership (RL) has become a buzz word in the current lexicon of business and politics, but there is still limited agreement on the components, scope, and characteristics. The confusion is rooted, in part, in the dominance of normative perspectives that take RL as a universal phenomenon. However, embedded in a specific culture, RL cannot be understood fully without understanding the moral traditions of that culture. In this article, we used a case study method to explore how RL is understood and practiced in China. Taking the role theory perspective, we conducted in-depth interviews with 9 highly regarded responsible executive leaders and 92 stakeholders in and outside of their companies who were well acquainted with the leaders. Our findings reveal that in China, the moral character of leaders guides them to define and take responsibility for themselves, their employees, companies, and external stakeholders. The five dimensions of RL we identified and the relationships among the dimensions include characteristics that reflect Chinese culture, such as strong sentiment for the nation, self-discipline, developing employees philosophically, and ‘jun zi wu ben’ (a gentleman should focus on fundamental matters). We conclude by discussing the implications of our study for RL research and practice.

摘要

摘要

负责任的领导力(RL)是当前商业和政治词汇中的热门概念,但学术界对此概念的构成、作用范围和行为特征仍未形成共识。导致这种状况的部分原因在于学者们把这个概念作为一种与文化无关的现象来研究。我们认为,负责任的领导力与其所在的社会文化及道德传统息息相关。本研究采用案例法探讨了中国文化背景下负责任领导力 的内涵和实践。依据角色理论,我们深度采访了9 位被广泛认同的负责任的高层领导者以及92 名熟悉这些领导者的内部各层级员工及外部利益相关者,然后对访谈内容进行了文本分析。结果表明,在中国,负责任的领导力包含五个方面:领导者的道德品格、在此基础上,领导者对自己、员工、公司以及外部利益相关者之责任的界定和履行。这五个方面中的具体行为表现,如国家情怀、自律、从思想上培养员工、“君子务本(君子应当专注于根本性事务)” 等,充分体现了中国文化特色。

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, S., & Bhal, K. T. 2020. A multidimensional measure of responsible leadership: Integrating strategy and ethics. Group & Organization Management, 45(5): 637673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antunes, A., & Franco, M. 2016. How people in organizations make sense of responsible leadership practices. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(1): 126152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. 2000. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 837853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badura, K. L., Galvin, B. M., & Lee, M. Y. 2022. Leadership emergence: An integrative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11): 20692100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedford, O., & Yeh, K. H. 2019. The history and the future of the psychology of filial piety: Chinese norms to contextualized personality construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biddle, B. J. 1979. Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Biddle, B. J. 1986. Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12(1): 6792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, K. 2011. Responsible leadership as virtuous leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1): 2535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X. L., Chen, H. H., & Zheng, M. Y. 2021. The structure dimension and scale development of responsible leadership in the Chinese cultural context. Chinese Journal of Management, 18(12): 17801789. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Cheong, M., Spain, S. M., Yammarino, F. J., & Yun, S. 2016. Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4): 602616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbert, A. E., & Witt, L. A. 2009. The role of goal-focused leadership in enabling the expression of conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3): 790796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, T. L. 1992. Public administration ethics: Theory and praxis in the United States of America. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 14(1): 7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N. E. D., & Humphrey, S. E. 2011. Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1): 752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drucker, P. F. 2007. Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Du, W. M. 2008. Zhong Yong Dong Jian (Zhong Yong Insights), translated by Duan D.Z. Beijing: People's Publishing House.Google Scholar
Eryong, X., & Li, J. 2021. What is the ultimate education task in China? Exploring ‘strengthen moral education for cultivating people’ (‘Li De Shu Ren’). Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(2): 128139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, M. 2016. Leading responsibly in the Asian century. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, B. M. 2005. The moral consequences of economic growth in markets. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Fu, P. P., Tsui, A. S., Liu, J., & Li, L. 2010. Pursuit of whose happiness? Executive leaders’ transformational behaviors and personal values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2): 222254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlin, D. 2003. The concepts of ‘self’, ‘person’, and ‘I’ in western psychology and in Buddhism. In Wallace, B. A. (Ed.), Buddhism and science: Breaking new ground: 107142. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publisher.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, W., & Cannella, A. A. 2006. The impact of strategic persistence on executive compensation. Journal of Management, 32(2): 257278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hind, P., Wilson, A., & Lenssen, G. 2009. Developing leaders for sustainable business. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(1): 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Wright, N. S., & Aditya, R. N. 1997. Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory. In Earley, P. C. & Erez, M. (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/ organizational psychology: 535625. San Francisco: New Lexington.Google Scholar
Hoyt, C. L., Price, T. L., & Poatsy, L. 2013. The social role theory of unethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5): 712723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, R. J. 2005. Chinese traditional human relationship and moral views of five ethics. Hebei Academic Journal, 25(2): 7884. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Jing, H. F. 2008. Re-examing the concept of Wu Lun (the five cardinal relationships). Philosophical Studies, 5: 5158. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Karakas, F. 2010. Spirituality and performance in organizations: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1): 89106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Koh, C., Fernando, M., & Spedding, T. 2018. Exercising responsible leadership in a Singapore context. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(1): 3450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-S. 2021. In defense of Chinese sensibility: Confucian Aesthetics in the 20th century. In Elstein, D. (Ed.), Dao companion to contemporary Confucian philosophy: 513540. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. Y. 2006. The Confucian ideal of harmony. Philosophy East & West, 56(4): 583603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W., Li, S., Feng, J., Wang, M., Zhang, H., Frese, M., & Wu, C. 2021. Can becoming a leader change your personality? An investigation with two longitudinal studies from a role-based perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(6): 882901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, T. Q., & Stening, B. W. 2016. The contextualization and de-contextualization of Confucian morality: Making Confucianism relevant to China's contemporary challenges in business ethics. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3): 821841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z. C., & Wang, H. L. 2015. Inheritance and reconstruction of family and country sentiment. Jiangxi Social Science, 7: 4146. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Low, P. C., & Ang, S. 2013. Confucian ethics, governance and corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(4): 3043.Google Scholar
Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. 2017. Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4: 339366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. 2006. Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society – a relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1): 99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maak, T., Pless, N. M., & Voegtlin, C. 2016. Business statesman or shareholder advocate? CEO responsible leadership styles and the micro-foundations of political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3): 463493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Koopman, J., & Conlon, D. E. 2015. Does seeing ‘eye to eye’ affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6): 16861708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. 2008. Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 507536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, J. A. 2012. Role Theory. In Miles, J. A. (Ed.), Management and organization theory: 225231. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Nie, D., & Lämsä, A.-M. 2015. The leader–member exchange theory in the Chinese context and the ethical challenge of guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4): 851861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S. H., Westphal, J. D., & Stern, I. 2011. Set up for a fall: The insidious effects of flattery and opinion conformity toward corporate leaders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2): 257302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, K., Mumford, M. D., Bower, I., & Watts, L. L. 2014. Qualitative and historiometric methods in leadership research: A review of the first 25 years of The Leadership Quarterly. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1): 132151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W., Li, Y., & Tian, L. 2016. Tian-ren-he-yi strategy: An Eastern perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3): 695722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pless, N. M. 2007. Understanding responsible leadership: Role identity and motivational drivers. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 437456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. 2011. Responsible leadership: Pathways to the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1): 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pless, N. M., Sengupta, A., Wheeler, M. A., & Maak, T. 2022. Responsible leadership and the reflective CEO: Resolving stakeholder conflict by imagining what could be done. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(1): 313337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, Y. H. 2008. Exploration into Chinese traditional Confucian thoughts on responsibility. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(11): 12211228. (In Chinese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. 2016. Universe and inner self in early Indian and early Greek thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, M., Huertas, E., & Scott, G. 2000. Am I my brother's keeper?: A case study of the responsibilities of research. Human Organization, 59(4): 389400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Y. J. 2005. On tian ren he yi (unity of heaven and man). History of Chinese Philosophy, 2: 17. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. 2000. Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4): 397423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. 1999. The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists – not convergent theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 222227.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2021. Responsible research and responsible leadership studies. Academy of Management Discoveries, 7(2): 166170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, W. M. 2018. Spiritual humanism: Self, community, earth, and heaven. Paper presented at the 24th World Congress of Philosophy, Beijing, August 2018.Google Scholar
Turner, R. H. 2001. Role Theory. In Turner, J. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory: 233254. Boston, MA: Springer US.Google Scholar
Voegtlin, C., Frisch, C., Walther, A., & Schwab, P. 2020. Theoretical development and empirical examination of a three-roles model of responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3): 411431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, D. A., & Balven, R. M. 2014. Responsible leadership: Theoretical issues and research directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3): 224234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. M. 2008. Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4): 327341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Stahl, G. K. 2020. Defining the socially responsible leader: Revisiting issues in responsible leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(1): 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. M. 2012. Interpreted by Deng, A. M. Chuan Xi Lu. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Witt, M. A., & Stahl, G. K. 2016. Foundations of responsible leadership: Asian versus Western executive responsibility orientations toward key stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3): 623638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaffe, T., & Kark, R. 2011. Leading by example: The case of leader OCB. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4): 806826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. Qualitative Research Methods, 5(14): 359386.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. N. 1985. An analysis of the thought of ‘harmony between man and nature’ in Chinese Philosophy. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 1: 18. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. 2017. Interpreting the Chinese characteristics from country-acknowledged family and country sentiment. Jiang-huai Tribune, 3: 1721, +87. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhang, X. L., & Lu, Y. H. 2011. The dimensions of responsible leadership for managers in the Chinese organizational context. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 17(2): 136144. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Li, D., & Guo, X. 2022. Antecedents of responsible leadership: Proactive and passive responsible leadership behavior. Sustainability, 14(14): 8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar