Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:47:43.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of pre- and post-partum energy and protein supply on the performance of single- and twin-suckling beef cows and their calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. D. Sinclair ,
P. J. Broadbent  and
J. S. M. Hutchinson
K. D. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Department of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
P. J. Broadbent
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Department of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
J. S. M. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, Department of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Abstract

Changes in live weight, body condition, milk production and composition were monitored for single- and twinsuckling cows in two experiments. In experiment 1, all cows were managed for 3 months before calving to achieve condition scores at calving 2·1 (low) and 3·1 (moderate). Subsequently, these animals were placed on a fixed level of energy intake (80 MJ metabolizable energy (ME) per day) for 16 weeks. Post-partum diets contained differing amounts of digestible undegradable protein (DUP), but similar amounts of effective rumen degradable protein (ERDP). In experiment 2, single- and twin-suckling cows were fed to achieve a condition score at calving of around 2·75. These animals were subsequently placed on two levels of energy intake (80 MJ and 130 MJ ME per day) during the first 16 weeks of lactation. The diets providing these energy intakes also contained differing amounts of DUP. Neither the level of DUP in the diet nor the level of feeding significantly altered the digestibility of the dry matter or organic matter in the dry matter of the experimental diets.

Body condition at calving had little effect on daily milk yield (9·5 kg) and composition (33·5 g/kg fat; 30-0 g/kg protein) in experiment 1. Cows with higher body condition scores at calving lost 13·5 kg more live weight and 0·26 units more body condition (P < 0·05) during the 1st month post partum but remained in better condition throughout the trial period than cows with lower body condition scores. Cows on 130 MJ ME per day produced higher (P < 0·001) daily yields of milk, milk fat and protein (+2·0 kg; +151 g; +85 g) and lost 57 kg less live weight and 0·52 units less body condition (P < 0·001) than cows on 80 MJ ME per day. Elevated dietary levels of DUP promoted (P < 0·05) daily milk yields (by 1·25 kg) and reduced live-weight and body condition-score loss during the 1st month post partum in both experiments. Twin-suckling cows produced the highest average daily yields of milk throughout the 16-week trial period in both experiments but yields were not significantly higher after early lactation in experiment 1. Cow body condition score at calving and the level of DUP in the post-partum diet of cows had no effect on the post-partum performance of calves. Twin calves had slower growth rates (P < 0·001) than single calves (0·65 and 1·07 kg/day respectively) in experiment 1. However, twin calves sucking cows on 130 MJ ME per day in experiment 2 grew similarly to single sucking calves from week 8 of lactation (0·8 kg/day).

Keywords

beef cowsbody conditionenergy intakeprotein intaketwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , December 1994 , pp. 379 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biggs, D. A. 1979. Performance specifications for infra-red milk analysis. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 62: 1211–1214.Google Scholar
Broadbent, P. J., McIntosh, J. A. R. and Spence, A. 1970. The evaluation of a device for feeding group housed animals individually. Animal Production 12: 245–252.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M., Broadbent, P. J. and Topps, J. H. 1984. A model of the energy system of lactating and pregnant cows. Animal Production 38: 351–362.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Robinson, J. J., McHattie, I. and Pennie, K. 1981. Effects of protein concentration in the diet on milk yield, changes in body composition and the efficiency of utilization of body tissue for milk production in ewes. Animal Production 33: 111–120.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. M., Bruce, C. I., Buttery, P. J., Gill, M. and Beever, D. E. 1988. Protein metabolism in the rumen of silage-fed steers: effect of fishmeal supplementation. British journal of Nutrition 60: 339–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diskin, M. G., McEvoy, T. G. and Sreenan, J. M. 1990. A comparison of the growth rate of single- and twin-born beef calves. Animal Production 50: 546 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1971. Single-suckled beef production. 1. Influence of stocking rate during the grazing season, creep grazing of the calf and double-suckling on liveweight changes and milk production of the cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 10: 287–295.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. and Bath, I. H. 1976. Single-suckled beef production. 3. Effect of plane of nutrition during late pregnancy on cow performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 15: 157–168.Google Scholar
Drewry, K. J., Brown, C. J. and Honea, R. S. 1959. Relationships among factors associated with mothering ability in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 18: 938–946.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. 1980. The control of food intake by the dairy cow in relation to body condition at calving and subsequent performance. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. 1988. The effect of energy reserves at calving on performance of dairy cows. In Nutrition and lactation in the dairy cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.). Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and Small, J. C. 1990. The direct and residual effects of giving fish meal to dairy cows receiving differing levels of concentrate supplementation in addition to grass silage. Animal Production 51: 449–460.Google Scholar
Gregory, K. E., Echternkamp, S. E., Dickerson, G. E., Cundiff, L. V., Koch, R. M. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1990. Twinning in cattle. III. Effects of twinning on dystocia, reproductive traits, calf survival, calf growth and cow productivity. Journal of Animal Science 68: 3133–3144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, G. P. and Garnsworthy, P. C. 1989. The effects of dietary energy content on the response of dairy cows to body condition at calving. Animal Production 49: 183–191.Google Scholar
Khan, M. A. S., Topps, J. H. and Broadbent, P. J. 1986. Influence of different levels of dietary energy on performance of double-suckled cows and calves. Animal Production 42: 464 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Land, C. and Leaver, J. D. 1980. The effect of body condition at calving on the milk production and feed intake of dairy cows. Animal Production 30: 449 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Land, C. and Leaver, J. D. 1981. The effect of body condition at calving on the production of Friesian cows and heifers. Animal Production 32: 362 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A. and Somerville, S. H. 1976. Condition scoring of cattle. Rev. Ed. Bulletin, East of Scotland College of Agriculture, no. 6.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, G. A., Caffrey, P. J., Kelleher, D. L. and Brophy, P. O. 1991. Twinning in a suckler herd. 1. Effects on performance of cows and their calves. Irish Journal Agricultural Research 30: 1–9.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. 1984. Protein-energy interrelationships in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 1090–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A. and Kay, R. N. B. 1977. Effect of postruminal glucose or protein supplementation on milk yield and composition in Friesian cows in early lactation and negative energy balance. British Journal of Nutrition 38: 397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. and McDonald, I. 1981. The effects of protein degradability and food intake on milk yield and composition in cows in early lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 45: 547–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, A. C., Topps, J. H. and Paterson, G. F. M. 1981. Response of underfed beef cows suckling two calves to an undegradable source of protein. Animal Production 32: 387 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Peart, J. N., Eadie, J., MacDonald, A. J. and White, I. R. 1979. The effect of energy intake during late pregnancy on the production from two genotypes of suckler cow. Animal Production 28: 309–327.Google Scholar
Sinclair, L. A., Garnsworthy, P. C., Newbold, J. R. and Buttery, P. J. 1993. Effect of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120: 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, K. D., Broadbent, P. J. and Hutchinson, J. S. M. 1994. The effect of pre- and post-partum energy and protein supply on the blood metabolites and reproductive performance of single- and twin-suckling beef cows. Animal Production 59: 391–400.Google Scholar
Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. 1992. Report no. 9, nutritive requirements of ruminant anifnals. Agricultural and Food Research Council.Google Scholar
Topps, J. H., Islam, Md., Broadbent, P. J. and Paterson, G. F. M. 1989. Effect of pre-calving nutrition on the performance of twin bearing beef cows and their calves. Animal Production 48: 617 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Udén, P., Colucci, P. E. and Van Soest, P. J. 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31: 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varga, G. A., Hoover, W. H., Junkins, L. O. and Shriver, B. 1982. Effects of urea and isoacids on in vitro fermentation of diets containing formaldehyde treated soybean meal. Journal of Dairy Science 65: suppl. 1, pp. 125 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Milne, J. S., Ørskov, E. R. and Smith, J. S. 1986. The nitrogen and energy metabolism of lactating cows given abomasal infusions of casein. British Journal of Nutrition 55: 537–556.Google Scholar
Zerbini, E., Polan, C. E. and Herbein, J. H. 1988. Effect of dietary soybean meal and fish meal on protein digesta flow in Holstein cows during early and mid lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 1248–1258.Google Scholar