Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:40:16.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution, biology and host specificity of Cyrtobagous singularis Hustache (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the biological control of Salvinia molesta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

I. W. Forno
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Long Pocket Laboratories, Private Bag No. 3, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia.
D. P. A. Sands
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Long Pocket Laboratories, Private Bag No. 3, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia.
W. Sexton
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Long Pocket Laboratories, Private Bag No. 3, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia.

Abstract

Cyrtobagous singularis Hust. was recorded from Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentina in association with six species of Salvinia (aquatic ferns). Field observations and laboratory studies in Brazil and Australia showed that C. singularis severely damaged S. molesta and that the weevil is suitable as a control agent for this weed in tropical and subtropical areas in Australia. In host-specificity studies using 46 plant species that occur in Australia, development of the immature stages took place only on S. molesta. Minor leaf scarring occurred on sweet potato when in contact with water, but starvation tests excluded this plant as a possible terrestrial host. Adults fed, but were unable to reproduce, on water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes). The high degree of host specificity indicated that establishment of this weevil in Australia is without risk to non-target plants. C. singularis was first released and became established in Australia in 1980.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, F. D.. (1966). Investigations on the insects attacking the aquatic ferns, Salvinia spp., in Trinidad and northern South America. —497504in Upchurch, R. P. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Nineteenth Southern Weed Conference, Jacksonville, Florida, 1966–638 pp. St. Louis., Mo., Sth. Weed Conf.Google Scholar
Bennett, F. D.. (1975). Insects and plant pathogens for the control of Salvinia and Pistia, 2835in Proceedings of a Symposium on Water Quality Management through Biological Control, Gainesville, Florida, 23-30 January 1975.–164 pp. Univ. Florida.Google Scholar
Britton, E. B.. (1970). Coleoptera (beetles). —495621in Mackerras, I. M. (Ed.) The insects of Australia, a textbook for students and research workers.–1029 pp. Carlton, Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Cary, P. R. & Weerts, P. G. J. (1981). Growth of Salvinia molesta as affected by nutrition and water temperature. —pp. 3546in Del Fosse, E. S. (Ed..) Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Brisbane, Australia, 22-29 July 1980.–649 pp. Melbourne, CSIRO.Google Scholar
COOK, C. D. K. & Gut, B. J. (1971). Salvinia in the State of Kerala, India.—Pest Artic. & News Summ. 17, 438447.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. & Thomas, P. L. (1977). The Salvinia molesta problem in the northern Botswana & eastern Caprivi area.—pp. 221237in Proceedings of the Second National Weeds Conference of South Africa, Stellenbosch, 2-4 February 1977.–344 pp. Cape Town, Rotterdam, A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Farrell, T. P. (1978). The spread and control of Salvinia molesta in Lake Moondarra, Mount Isa, Queensland.—pp. 179187in Proceedings of the First Conference of the Council of Australian Weed Science Societies held at National Science Centre, Parkville, Victoria 12-14 April 1978.–446 pp. Frankston, Victoria, Coun. Aust. Weed Sci. Soc.Google Scholar
Forno, I. W. and Harley, K. L. S. (1979). The occurrence of Salvinia molesta in Brazil. —Aquat. Bot. 6, 185187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissinger, D. G. (1966). Cyrtobagous Hustache, a genus of weevils new to the United States fauna (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Bagoini). —Coleopts Bull. 20, 125127.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. S. (1969). The ecology of vascular hydrophytes on Lake Kariba. –Hydrobiologia 34, 448464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, D. S. & Thomas, P. A. (1972). Ecology of waterweeds in the Neotropics. –UNESCO Tech. Pap. Hydrol. no. 12, 50 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. S.Petr, T. & Viner, A. B. (1980). The water-fern Salvinia molesta in the Sepik River, Papua New Guinea. –Environ. Conserv. 7, 115122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, D. P. A. & Harley, K. L. S. (1981). Importance of geographical variation in agents selected for biological control of weeds.—pp. 8189in Del Fosse, E. S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium Biological Control of Weeds, Brisbane, Australia, July 1980.—649 pp. Melbourne, CSIRO.Google Scholar
Senaratna, J. E. (1943). Salvinia auriculata Aublet, a recently introduced free-floating water weed. —Trop. Agric. Mag. Ceylon agric. Soc. 99, 146149.Google Scholar
Room, P. M., Harley, K. L. S., Forno, I. W. & Sands, D. P. A. (1981). Successful biological control of the floating weed salvinia. —Nature, Lond. 294, 7880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wapshere, A. J. (1974). A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. —Ann. appl. Biol. 77, 201211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. H. (1956). Salvinia auriculata Aubl.: the chemical eradication of a serious aquatic weed in Ceylon. —Trop. Agric, Trin. 33, 145157.Google Scholar