Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T11:39:17.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduced alarm response by peach–potato aphids, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), with knock-down resistance to insecticides (kdr)may impose a fitness cost through increased vulnerability to natural enemies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S.P. Foster*
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK
C.M. Woodcock
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK
M.S. Williamson
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK
A.L. Devonshire
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK
I. Denholm
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK
R. Thompson
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK
*
* Fax: 01582 762595 E-mail: stephen.foster@bbsrc.ac.uk

Abstract

Termites were sampled using randomized soil pits in 64 cropping plots, each 25 x 25 m, forming an experimental agrisilvicultural system in both a 6- and an 18-year-old Terminalia ivorensis plantation, in which canopy cover, crop, cropping system and land preparation were the principal treatment variables. The treatments were established in April 1995 and sampling was carried out in November 1995, February 1996 and July 1996. A total of 82 termite species were found, of which 67 were soil-feeders. Overall termite abundance and the abundance of soil-feeders increased between November 1995 and July 1996, reaching a mean of nearly 6000 m-2. Pooling termite data from these sampling dates, in the old plantation, the high canopy cover treatment (192 stems ha-1) had a greater abundance of termites, compared with the low canopy cover treatment (64 stems ha-1) and this effect was independent of crop type (plantain or cocoyam), cropping system (single stands or mixed crops) and land preparation (mulch retained or burned, plantain only). The young tree plantation (same tree densities as in the old plantation) showed no significant difference in termite abundance between high and low canopy (levels of tree foliage) densities, though the high canopy sheltered a greater number of termites. Analysis of covariance showed that crop yield (both plantain and cocoyam) was not directly linked to the abundance of all termite populations, but that the cocoyam yield was positively correlated with the abundance of soil-feeding termites (the majority in the assemblage) in the young plantation. This may be due to the beneficial conditioning of soil resulting from the foraging and construction activities of soil-feeders.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldous, P. (1995) Global heat breeds superaphids. New Scientist 2009/2010, 17.Google Scholar
Awmack, C.S., Woodcock, C.M. & Harrington, R. (1997) Climate change may increase vulnerability of aphids to natural enemies. Ecological Entomology 22, 366368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L. (1971) Variation in the photoperiodic response within natural populations of Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Bulletin of Entomological Research 60, 533546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L. & Takada, H. (1975) A naturally occurring chromosomal translocation in Myzus persicae. Journal of Entomology 50, 147156.Google Scholar
Dawson, G.W., Griffiths, D.C., Pickett, J.A. & Woodcock, C.M. (1983) Decreased response to alarm pheromone by insecticide-resistant aphids. Naturwissenschaften 70, 254255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devonshire, A.L. & Moores, G.D. (1982) A carboxylesterase with broad substrate specificity causes organophosphorus, carbamate and pyrethroid resistance in peach–potato aphids (Myzus persicae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 18, 235246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devonshire, A.L., Moores, G.D. & ffrench-Constant, R.H. (1986) Detection of insecticide resistance by immunological estimation of carboxylesterase activity in Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and cross reaction of the antiserum with Phorodon humili (Schrank) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 76, 97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dill, L.M., Fraser, A.H.G. & Roitberg, B.D. (1990) The economics of escape behaviour in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Oecologia 83, 473478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ffrench-Constant, R.H. & Roush, R.T. (1990) Resistance detection and documentation: the relative roles of pesticidal and biochemical assays. pp. 438in Roush, R.T. & Tabashnik, B.E. (Eds) Pesticide resistance in arthropods. London, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, L.M., Devonshire, A.L. & Forde, B.G. (1988) Molecular evidence that insecticide resistance in peach–potato aphids (Myzus persicae) results from amplification of an esterase gene. Biochemical Journal 251, 309312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, L.M., Devonshire, A.L., ffrench-Constant, R.H. & Forde, B.G. (1989) Changes in DNA methylation are associated with loss of insecticide resistance in the peach–potato aphid Myzus persicae (Sulz.). Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters 243, 323327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, L.M., Anderson, A.P., Denholm, I., Foster, S.P., Harling, Z.K., Javed, N., Martinez-Torres, D., Moores, G.D., Williamson, M.S. & Devonshire, A.L. (1997) Exploitation of biochemical and DNA diagnostics for characterising multiple mechanisms of insecticide resistance in the peach–potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Pesticide Science 51, 283289.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S.P., Harrington, R., Devonshire, A.L., Denholm, I., Devine, G.J., Kenward, M.G. & Bale, J.S. (1996) Comparative survival of insecticide-susceptible and resistant peach–potato aphids, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in low temperature field trials. Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S.P., Harrington, R., Devonshire, A.L., Denholm, I., Clark, S.J. & Mugglestone, M.A. (1997) Evidence for a possible trade-off between insecticide resistance and the low temperature movement that is essential for survival of UK populations of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 87, 573579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S.P., Denholm, I., Harling, Z.K., Moores, G.D. & Devonshire, A.L. (1998) Intensification of insecticide resistance in UK field populations of the peach–potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in 1996. Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 127130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furk, C., Hines, C.M., Smith, S.D.J. & Devonshire, A.L. (1990) Seasonal variation of susceptible and resistant variants of Myzus persicae. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Pests and Diseases 3, 12071212.Google Scholar
Houghton, J.T., Meirs Filho, L.G., Callander, B.A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A. & Maskell, K. (1996) Climate Change 1995, the Science of Climate Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lilly, M., Kreber, R., Ganetzky, B. & Carlson, J.R. (1994) Evidence that the Drosophila olfactory mutant smellblind defines a novel class of sodium channel mutation. Genetics 136, 10871096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddrell, S.H.P. (1969) Secretion by the Malpighian tubules of Rhodnius. The movement of ions and water. Journal of Experimental Biology 51, 7197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Torres, D., Foster, S.P., Field, L.M., Devonshire, A.L. & Williamson, M.S. (1999) A sodium channel point mutation is associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroid insecticides in the peach–potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insect Molecular Biology 8, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A. (1989) Generalized linear models. 2nd edn. London, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moores, G.D., Devine, G.J. & Devonshire, A.L. (1994) Insecticide-insensitive acetylcholinesterase can enhance esterase-based resistance in Myzus persicae and Myzus nicotianae. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 49, 114120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muggleton, J., Hockland, S., Thind, B.B., Lane, A. & Devonshire, A.L. (1996) Long-term stability in the frequency of insecticide resistance in the peach–potato aphid, Myzus persicae, in England. Proceedings of the 1996 Brighton Crop Protection Conference 2, 739744.Google Scholar
Pickett, J.A., Wadhams, L.J., Woodcock, C.M. & Hardie, J. (1992) The chemical ecology of aphids. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 6790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.D.J. & Furk, C. (1989) The spread of the resistant aphid. Sugar Beet Review 57, 46.Google Scholar
Vais, H., Williamson, M.S., Hick, C.A., Eldursi, N., Devonshire, A.L. & Usherwood, P.N.R. (1997) Functional analysis of a rat sodium channel carrying a mutation for insect knock-down resistance (kdr) to pyrethroids. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters 413, 327332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wadhams, L.J., Angst, M.E. & Blight, M.M. (1982) Responses of the olfactory receptors of Scolytus scolytus (F.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to the stereoisomers of 4-methyl-3-heptanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology 8, 477492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D.A. (1982) Extra-binomial variation in logistic linear models. Applied Statistics 31, 144148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar