Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:11:56.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal change and microhabitat association of Arctic spider assemblages (Arachnida: Araneae) on Victoria Island (Nunavut, Canada)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Elyssa R. Cameron*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Rd, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, H9X 3V9, Canada
Christopher M. Buddle
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Rd, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, H9X 3V9, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: elyssa.cameron@mail.mcgill.ca)

Abstract

Arctic ecosystems are characterised by a mosaic of distinct microhabitats, which play a key role in structuring biodiversity. Understanding species diversity in relation to these microhabitats, and how communities are structured seasonally, is imperative to properly conserve, monitor, and manage northern biodiversity. Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) are dominant arthropod predators in the Arctic, yet the seasonal change in their communities in relation to microhabitat variation is relatively unknown. This research quantified how spider assemblages are structured seasonally and by microhabitat, near Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, Canada. In 2014, spiders were collected in 240 pan and pitfall traps placed in common microhabitat types (two wet and two dry) from 3 July to 11 August, the active season in the high Arctic. In total, 10 353 spiders from 22 species and four families were collected. Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordinations revealed that spider assemblages from wet habitats were distinct from those occurring in drier habitats, but that differences within each of those habitats were not evident. Abundance and diversity was highest in wet habitats and differed significantly from dry habitats; both these variables decreased seasonally. Spider assemblages in the north are structured strongly along moisture gradients, and such data informs planning for future ecological monitoring in the Arctic.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Derek Sikes

References

Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. 2004. Impacts of a warming Arctic: Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Beals, M.L. 2006. Understanding community structure: a data-driven multivariate approach. Oecologia, 150: 484495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0551-8.Google Scholar
Beckerman, A.P., Uriarte, M., and Schmitz, O.J. 1997. Experimental evidence for a behavior-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94: 1073510738. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.20.10735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, J.J. and Buddle, C.M. 2010a. Determinants of ground-dwelling spider assemblages at a regional scale in the Yukon Territory, Canada. Ecoscience, 17: 287297. https://doi.org/10.2980/17-3-3308.Google Scholar
Bowden, J.J. and Buddle, C.M. 2010b. Spider assemblages across elevational and latitudinal gradients in the Yukon Territory, Canada. Arctic, 63: 261272. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic1490.Google Scholar
Bowden, J.J., Hansen, R.R., Olsen, K., and Hoye, T.T. 2015. Habitat-specific effects of climate change on a low-mobility Arctic spider species. Polar Biology, 38: 559568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-014-1622-7.Google Scholar
Buddle, C.M., Beguin, J., Bolduc, E., Mercado, A., Sackett, T.E., Selby, R.D., et al. 2005. The importance and use of taxon sampling curves for comparative biodiversity research with forest arthropod assemblages. The Canadian Entomologist, 137: 120127. https://doi.org/10.4039/n04-040.Google Scholar
Cardoso, P., Pekar, S., Jocque, R., and Coddington, J.A. 2011. Global patterns of guild composition and functional diversity of spiders. Public Library of Science One, 6: 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. 1992. Arctic insects as indicators of environmental change. Arctic, 45: 159166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVito, J., Meik, J.M., Gerson, M.M., and Formanowicz, D.R. 2004. Physiological tolerances of three sympatric riparian wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) correspond with microhabitat distributions. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 82: 11191125. https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-090.Google Scholar
Dondale, C.D., Redner, J.H., Paquin, P., and Levi, H.W. 2003. The insects and arachnids of Canada part 23: The orb-weaving spiders of Canada and Alaska, Araneae: Uloboridae, Tetragnathidae, Araneidae, Theridiosomatidae. National Research Council Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Eldridge, D.J., Bowker, M.A., Maestre, F.T., Roger, E., Reynolds, J.F., and Whitford, W.G. 2011. Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning: towards a global synthesis. Ecology Letters, 14: 709722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01630.x.Google Scholar
Ernst, C.M. and Buddle, C.M. 2013. Seasonal patterns in the structure of epigeic beetle (Coleoptera) assemblages in two subarctic habitats in Nunavut, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 145: 171183. https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2012.111.Google Scholar
Ernst, C.M., Loboda, S., and Buddle, C.M. 2015. Capturing northern biodiversity: diversity of Arctic, subarctic and north boreal beetles and spiders are affected by trap type and habitat. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 9: 6373. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12143.Google Scholar
Estes, J.A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J.S., Power, M.E., Berger, J., Bond, W.J., et al. 2011. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science, 333: 301306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205106.Google Scholar
Finch, O.D., Blick, T., and Schuldt, A. 2008. Macroecological patterns of spider species richness across Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17: 28492868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9400-x.Google Scholar
Greenstone, M.H. 1984. Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity vs. prey availability. Oecologia, 62: 299304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384260.Google Scholar
Halaj, J., Ross, D.W., and Moldenke, A.R. 2000. Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies. Oikos, 90: 139152. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900114.x.Google Scholar
Hansen, R.R., Hansen, O.L.P., Bowden, J.J., Treier, U.A., Normand, S., and Høye, T.T. 2016. Meter scale variation in shrub dominance and soil moisture structure in Arctic arthropod communities. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Høye, T.T., Post, E., Meltofte, H., Schmidt, N.M., and Forchhammer, M.C. 2007. Rapid advancement of spring in the High Arctic. Current Biology, 17: 449451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.047.Google Scholar
Ims, R.A. and Henden, J.A. 2012. Collapse of an Arctic bird community resulting from ungulate-induced loss of erect shrubs. Biological Conservation, 149: 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koponen, S. 1992. Spider fauna (Aranea) of the Low Arctic Belcher-Islands, Hudson-Bay. Arctic, 45: 358362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrivée, M. and Buddle, C.M. 2009. Diversity of canopy and understorey spiders in north-temperate hardwood forests. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 11: 225237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2008.00421.x.Google Scholar
Legault, G. and Weis, A.E. 2013. The impact of snow accumulation on a heath spider community in a sub-Arctic landscape. Polar Biology, 36: 885894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-013-1313-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallis, R.E. and Hurd, L.E. 2005. Diversity among ground-dwelling spider assemblages: habitat generalists and specialists. Journal of Arachnology, 33: 101109. https://doi.org/10.1636/m03-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusik, Y.M. and Koponen, S. 2000. Circumpolar diversity of spiders: implications for research, conservation and management. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 37: 265269.Google Scholar
Marusik, Y.M. and Koponen, S. 2002. Diversity of spiders in boreal and arctic zones. Journal of Arachnology, 30: 205210. https://doi.org/10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0205:dosiba]2.0.co;2.Google Scholar
McLennan, D., Wagner, I., Bennett, B., Meidinger, D., Turner, D., Will, M., et al. 2013. Ecology and biodiversity of Cambridge Bay, Victoria Island, Nunavut results of field studies, Summer 2013 [online]. Available from above.nasa.gov [accessed 25 January 2017].Google Scholar
Myers-Smith, I.H., Forbes, B.C., Wilmking, M., Hallinger, M., Lantz, T., Blok, D., et al. 2011. Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities. Environmental Research Letters, 6: 045509. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045509.Google Scholar
Naito, A.T. and Cairns, D.M. 2011. Patterns and processes of global shrub expansion. Progress in Physical Geography, 35: 423442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311403538.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R., et al. 2015. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2. 3-0. Available from cran.r-project.org/package=vegan [accessed 19 January 2017].Google Scholar
Paquin, P. and Duperre, N. 2003. Guide d’indentification des Araignees (Araneae) du Quebec. Fabreries Supplement, 11: 87171.Google Scholar
Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 37: 637669. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100.Google Scholar
Pearce, J.L., Venier, L.A., Eccles, G., Pedlar, J., and McKenney, D. 2004. Influence of habitat and microhabitat on epigeal spider (Araneae) assemblages in four stand types. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13: 13051334. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000019403.26948.55.Google Scholar
Pickavance, J.R. 2006. The spiders of East Bay, Southampton Island, Nunavut, Canada. Arctic, 59: 276282.Google Scholar
Pinzon, J., Spence, J.R., and Langor, D.W. 2012. Responses of ground-dwelling spiders (Araneae) to variable retention harvesting practices in the boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 266: 4253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.1.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rich, M.E., Gough, L., and Boelman, N.T. 2013. Arctic arthropod assemblages in habitats of differing shrub dominance. Ecography, 36: 9941003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.00078.x.Google Scholar
Rypstra, A.L., Carter, P.E., Balfour, R.A., and Marshall, S.D. 1999. Architectural features of agricultural habitats and their impact on the spider inhabitants. Journal of Arachnology, 27: 371377.Google Scholar
Schaffers, A.P., Raemakers, I.P., Sýkora, K. V., and Ter Braak, C.J.F. 2008. Arthropod assemblages are best predicted by plant species composition. Ecology, 89: 782794. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0361.1.Google Scholar
Schmitz, O.J. 2003. Top predator control of plant biodiversity and productivity in an old-field ecosystem. Ecology Letters, 6: 156163. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00412.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulp, I. and Schekkerman, H. 2008. Has prey availability for Arctic birds advanced with climate change? Hindcasting the abundance of tundra arthropods using weather and seasonal variation. Arctic, 61: 4860.Google Scholar
Uetz, G.W. 1991. Habitat structure and spider foraging. In Habitat structure. Edited by S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy, and H.R. Mushinsky. Chapman and Hall, Suffolk, United Kingdom. Pp. 325348. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3076-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uetz, G.W., Halaj, J., and Cady, A.B. 1999. Guild structure of spiders in major crops. Journal of Arachnology, 27: 270280.Google Scholar
Uetz, G.W. and Uetz, B.Y.G.W. 1977. Coexintence in a guild of wandering spiders. Journal of Animal Ecology, 46: 531541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, M.B. 1992. Management and diversity of arthropods in Calluna heathland. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1: 6379. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00731035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varady-Szabo, H. and Buddle, C.M. 2006. On the relationships between ground-dwelling spider (Araneae) assemblages and dead wood in a northern sugar maple forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15: 41194141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3369-5.Google Scholar
Walker, M.D., Wahren, C.H., Hollister, R.D., Henry, G.H.R., Ahlquist, L.E., Alatalo, J.M., et al. 2006. Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103: 13421346. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503198103.Google Scholar
Weeks, R.D. and Holtzer, T.O. 2000. Habitat and season in structuring ground-dwelling spider (Araneae) communities in a shortgrass steppe ecosystem. Environmental Entomology, 29: 11641172. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225x-29.6.1164.Google Scholar
Willis, K.J. and Whittaker, R.J. 2002. Species diversity – scale matters. Science, 295: 12451248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyant, K.A., Draney, M.L., and Moore, J.C. 2011. Epigeal spider (Araneae) communities in moist acidic and dry heath tundra at Toolik Lake, Alaska. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research, 43: 301312. https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-43.2.301.Google Scholar
Ziesche, T.M. and Roth, M. 2008. Influence of environmental parameters on small-scale distribution of soil-dwelling spiders in forests: what makes the difference, tree species or microhabitat. Forest Ecology and Management, 255: 738752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.060.Google Scholar