Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T10:34:14.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OCCURRENCE, DAMAGE PATTERN AND STATUS OF THE RICE LEAF FOLDER CNAPHALOCROCIS RURALIS WALKER (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) IN ERIANTHUS SPP. IN INDIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2018

P. MAHESH ,
J. SRIKANTH ,
K. CHANDRAN ,
B. SINGARAVELU ,
K. P. SALIN ,
C. JAYABOSE  and
S. BALAN
P. MAHESH*
Affiliation:
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
J. SRIKANTH
Affiliation:
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
K. CHANDRAN
Affiliation:
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute Research Centre, Kannur, Kerala, India
B. SINGARAVELU
Affiliation:
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
K. P. SALIN
Affiliation:
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
C. JAYABOSE
Affiliation:
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
S. BALAN
Affiliation:
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute Research Centre, Kannur, Kerala, India
*
§Corresponding author. Email: agrimahesh@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We investigated the occurrence and status of the leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis ruralis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in accessions of Erianthus spp. maintained as a part of the world germplasm collection at the Research Center of ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Kannur, Kerala State, India. The nature, pattern, extent and year-to-year variation in damage were examined and accessions categorized based on relative incidence. The larvae of C. ruralis caused characteristic injury by feeding on chlorophyll bearing tissues leading to the formation of white and transparent streaks on the leaf blade. The grown-up larvae folded the leaf longitudinally with the adaxial surface inside the fold and exposing the abaxial surface, the edges being held in place by bands of silk thread at regular intervals. The length of leaf folds varied from 2.6 to 27.0 cm with a mean of 9.1 cm, which roughly constituted 7.3% of the mean length of the leaf blade. Leaf length, leaf width and leaf area were not correlated with either the leaf fold length or the number of webs. However, the leaf fold length was positively correlated with the number of webs. Attack rates (infestation rate) on cane basis (up to 69.0%) were generally higher than the damage rates (intensity) on leaf basis (up to 50.0%); infestation index ranged between 0.0 and 13.7%. Correlations between infestation rate and intensity varied among the three study years. Non-parametric analysis indicated significant differences among the three years for percent of infested canes and infestation index but not percent of damaged leaves. All accessions showed C. ruralis incidence in at least one experimental year, indicating that none of the accessions tested was immune to its attack. When all 74 accessions were considered on the basis of infestation index, 85.1% were placed in low and moderate categories and only 14.9% in high incidence category. Within the accessions of Erianthus spp., leaf area was not related to infestation rate of cane or damage rate of leaves but positively related to infestation index. The dynamics of the leaf folder in the predominantly paddy ecosystem were discussed in the light of its first occurrence in Erianthus spp. accessions in India and the world.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 471 - 483
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous (2015). Agricultural Statistics 2014–15: District wise area and production of crops. Government of Kerala http://www.ecostat.kerala.gov.in/docs/pdf/reports/agristat/1516/dist_data_1415.pdf. [Accessed on 20 October 2015].Google Scholar
Arida, G. S. and Shepard, B. M. (1986). Seasonal abundance of the rice leaf folder complex in Laguna Province, Philippines. Journal of Agricultural Entomology 3 (4):382–383.Google Scholar
Augustine, S. M., Ashwin Narayan, J., Syamaladevi, D. P., Appunu, C., Chakravarthi, M., Ravichandran, V. and Subramonian, N. (2015). Erianthus arundinaceus HSP70 (EaHSP70) overexpression increases drought and salinity tolerance in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid). Plant Science, 232:23–34.Google Scholar
Ayquipa, A. G. and Sirlopu, R. J. (1975). Life-cycle, morphology and behaviour of Marasmia trapezalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) [Ciclo biologico, morfologia y comportamiento de Marasmia trapezalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)] [Spanish]. Saccharum 3 (2):1–25.Google Scholar
Baby Rani, W., Amutha, R., Muthulakshmi, S., Indira, K. and Mareeswari, P. (2007). Diversity of rice leaf folders and their natural enemies. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 3 (5):394–397.Google Scholar
Box, H. E. (1953). List of Sugarcane Insects, 101. London: Commonwealth Institute of Entomology.Google Scholar
Dale, D. (1994). Insect nests of the rice plant – their biology and ecology. In Biology and Management of Rice Insects, 363–485 (Ed Heinrichs, E. A.). International Rice Research Institute, Philippines: Wiley Eastern Limited and New Age International Limited, India.Google Scholar
David, H., Easwaramoorthy, S. and Jayanthi, R. (1986). Sugarcane Entomology in India, 564. Coimbatore: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.Google Scholar
Gunathilagaraj, K. and Gopalan, M. (1986). Rice leaffolder (LF) complex in Madurai, Tamil Nadu. International Rice Research Newsletter 11 (6):29.Google Scholar
Islam, Z. and Karim, A. N. M. R. (1997). Leaf folding behaviour of Cnaphalocrosis medinalis (Guenee) and Marasmia patnalis Bradley and the influence of rice leaf morphology on damage incidence. Crop Protection 16:215–220.Google Scholar
Khan, Z. R., Abenes, M. L. P. and Fernandez, M. J. (1996). Suitability of graminaceous weed species as host plants for rice leaffolders, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and Marasmia patnalis. Crop Protection 15 (2):121–127.Google Scholar
Khan, Z. R., Barrion, A. T., Litsinger, J. A., Castilla, N. P. and Joshi, R. C. (1988). A bibliography of rice leaf folders (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insect Science and its Application 9:129–174.Google Scholar
Leena Kumari, S. (2011). Status Paper on Rice in Kerala. Rice Knowledge Management Portal (RKMP), 32. http://www.rkmp.co.in/sites/default/files/ris/rice-state-wise/Status [Accessed on 04 January 2017].Google Scholar
Long, W. H. and Hensley, S. D. (1972). Insect pests of sugarcane. Annual Review of Entomology 17:149–176.Google Scholar
Mahesh, P., Chandran, K., Srikanth, J., Nisha, M. and Manjunatha, T. (2013). Natural incidence of Sesamia inferens Walker, in sugarcane germplasm. Sugar Tech 15 (4):384–389.Google Scholar
Mahesh, P., Srikanth, J. and Chandran, K. (2014). Pattern of pink stem borer Sesamia inferens (Walker) incidence in different crop seasons and Saccharum spp. Journal of Sugarcane Research 4 (1):91–95.Google Scholar
Mahesh, P., Srikanth, J., Chandran, K. and Nisha, M. (2015). Damage pattern and status of the leaf miner Aphanisticus aeneus Kerremans (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Saccharum spp. International Journal of Pest Management 61 (1):36–46.Google Scholar
Mahesh, P., Srikanth, J., Chandran, K. and Singaravelu, B. (2018). Resistance of Saccharum spp. against Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (Kapur) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in India. Experimental Agriculture 54 (1):83–95. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479716000697.Google Scholar
Nadarajan, L. and Skaria, B. P. (1988). Leaffolder (LF) resurgence and species composition in Pattambi, Kerala. International Rice Research Newsletter 13 (3):33–34.Google Scholar
Nair, M. R. G. K. (1986). Insects and Mites of Crops in India, 408, 2nd edn. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Nibouche, S., Tibère, R. and Costet, L. (2012). The use of Erianthus arundinaceus as a trap crop for the stem borer Chilo sacchariphagus reduces yield losses in sugarcane: Preliminary results. Crop Protection 42:10–15.Google Scholar
Rajendran, R., Rajendran, S. and Sandra, B. P. C. (1986). Varietal resistance of rice to leaf folder. International Rice Research Newsletter 11 (4):17–18.Google Scholar
Sardana, H. R. (2002). Evaluation of Saccharum barberi, S. sinense and Erianthus spp. clones of sugarcane for susceptibility to major borer pests. Annals of Plant Protection Science 10 (1):42–44.Google Scholar
Subramanian, A. (1990). Biology and management of rice leaf folders Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee and Marasmia patnalis Bradley (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 270.Google Scholar
Sugimoto, A. (2000). Development of sugarcane cultivation technology in Nansei Island of Japan: From breeding to machine development. Farming Japan 34 (4):16–26.Google Scholar
Varun, S., Ramaraju, K. and Chitra, N. (2017b). Revision of the genus Cnaphalocrocis (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) occurring on rice in Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 9 (1):3631–3636.Google Scholar
Varun, S., Singh, S., Rawal, R. and Venkatesh, Y. N. (2017a). Species diversity and distribution of Cnaphalocrocis and Scirpophaga (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) species complex in rice in Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5 (4):1308–1313.Google Scholar
Way, M. J., Webster, T. M. and Leslie, G. W. (2011). Leaf folder moth, Marasmia trapezalis, on sugarcane in South Africa. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologist Association 84:260–261.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mahesh et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Mahesh et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.1 KB