Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:58:26.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of wilting berseem and lucerne herbage on voluntary dry-matter intake by buffalo heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. Yoelao ,
M. G. Jackson  and
Ishwar Saran
K. Yoelao
Affiliation:
College of Agriculture, U.P. Agricultural University, Pantnagar, District Nainital, U.P., India
M. G. Jackson
Affiliation:
College of Agriculture, U.P. Agricultural University, Pantnagar, District Nainital, U.P., India
Ishwar Saran
Affiliation:
College of Agriculture, U.P. Agricultural University, Pantnagar, District Nainital, U.P., India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two changeover experiments, each on eight buffalo heifers, were conducted in two different years to determine the effect of wilting lucerne herbage (Exps. 1 and 2) and berseem herbage (Exp. 2 only) on voluntary dry-matter intake. The dry-matter content of the herbages increased by field wilting from 27 to 50 and from 26 to 44% for lucerne in Exps. 1 and 2 respectively, and from 21 to 31% for berseem. The drymatter intake, nutrient digestibility coefficients, nutritive value index and retention time of undigested residues were determined for each fresh and wilted herbage.

Wilting increased the dry-matter intake of lucerne from 2·3 to 2·8 and from 2·1 to 3·5 kg per 100 kg body weight in Exps. 1 and 2 respectively. Berseem dry-matter intake was increased from 2·2 to 3·1 kg per 100 kg body weight. Digestibility coefficients of all nutrients of both herbages increased by 6–20%. Retention times were unaffected by wilting. The nutritive value indices for lucerne and berseem in Exp. 2 increased by 160 and 60% respectively. In Exp. 2, the average loss of herbage dry matter due to wilting was 3·8%. The higher consumption of the wilted herbages is ascribed to their lower water content. The practical implications of these results are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 47 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, G. W. (1961). Effect of pasture maturity on the diet of sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilisation of feed by dairy cows. I. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. Br. J. Nutr. 4, 361.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Campling, R. C. (1962). Regulation of voluntary food intake in ruminants. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 32, 669.Google ScholarPubMed
Brandt, A. E. (1938). Tests of significance in reversal or switch-back trials. Res. Bull. Iowa agric. Exp. Stn. No. 234.Google Scholar
Castle, R. J. (1956). The rate of passage of foodstuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. I. Studies on adult animals fed on hay and concentrates. Br. J. Nutr. 10, 15.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G.Autery, K. M. & Cannon, C. Y. (1941). A double change over design for dairy cattle experiments. J. Dairy Sci. 24, 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Langlands, J. P. & Reid, G. W. (1963). Effects of season of growth and digestibility on herbage intake by grazing cows. Anim. Prod. 5, 119.Google Scholar
Cramtton, E. W., Donefer, E. & Lloyd, L. E. (1960). A nutritive value index for forages. J. Anim. Sci. 19, 538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarquilly, C. (1966). Nutritive value of lucerne. Fourrages 26, 12. (Cited in Herb. Abstr. 37, 275.)Google Scholar
Halley, R. S. & Dougall, B. M. (1962). The feed intake and performance of dairy cows fed on cut grass. J. Dairy Res. 29, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indian Standards Institution (1962). Specifications for balanced Feed Mixtures for Cattle, IS: 2051–1962. New Delhi: Indian Standards Institution.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. G.Saran, I. S. and Gupta, D. C. (1968). The comparative consumption of fresh and wilted lucerne and fresh berseem by buffalo calves. Paper presented at the Fifth Dairy Industry Conference, 5–8th 02 1968, Hyderabad, A.P., India.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. L., Hardison, W. W., Obdoveza, A. L. & Castillo, L. S. (1968). The nutritive value of Panicum maximum (guinea grass). III. Factors affecting vountary intake by cattle and water buffaloes. J. agric Sci., Camb. 71, 67.Google Scholar
Landis, J. (1937). Forseh. Geb. Wirtschaftswiss Landbaus, 231–42 (cited by Watson and Nash, 1960).Google Scholar
Paltridge, T. B. (1955). Studies on sown pastures for south-eastern Queensland. Commonwealth Sci. and Indust. Res. Organisation, Australia, Bull. 274, p. 108 (cited in Herb. Abstr. 26, 12).Google Scholar
Poijarvi, I. (1949). Tidkr. Lantman 31, 11 (cited by Balch & Campling, 1962).Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F. (1966). The nutritive value of herbage. Chapter 3, Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, Abrams, J. T. (ed.). London: J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google Scholar
Saran, I. S. & Jackson, M. G. (1967). The effect of substituting berseem in the mixed dairy ration on feeding cost. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 20, 25.Google Scholar
Watson, S. J. & Nash, M. J. (1960). The Conservation of Green Grass and Forage Crops. p. 70. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar