Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:11:04.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calorimetric studies on the effect of dietary energy source and environmental temperature on the metabolic efficiency of energy utilization by mature Light Sussex cockerels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. W. F. Shannon  and
W. O. Brown
D. W. F. Shannon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Chemistry Department, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland
W. O. Brown
Affiliation:
Agricultural Chemistry Department, Queen's University, Belfast, and Ministry of Agriculture, Northern Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experiments to determine the net availabilities of the metabolizable energy (NAME) of a cereal-based diet and a maize-oil diet for maintenance and lipogenesis and the effect of environmental temperature on the NAME of the cereal-based diet are described. Four 1- to 2-year-old Light Sussex cockerels were used.

The relationship between ME intake and energy retention was linear for each diet. The NAME'S of the cereal-based diet given at 22° and 28 °C (70.6 ± 1.83 % and 73.6 ± 3.54%, respectively) were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than the NAME of the maize-oil diet (84.1 ± 1.85%). It is concluded that the beneficial effect of maize oil on the efficiency of energy utilization is due to a reduced heat increment rather than a reduction in the basal component of the heat production. The higher efficiency from the maize-oil diet led to an increase in the energy retained as fat.

The mean fasting heat production at 28 °C was 15 % lower than at 22 °C (43.2 ± 1.45 and 51.2 ± 1.09 kcal/kg/day, respectively). The NAME of the cereal-based diet was not significantly different when the birds were kept at 22° or 28 °C. The lower metabolic rate at 28 °C was reflected in a lower maintenance requirement and in an increase in the deposition of body fat.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , June 1969 , pp. 479 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

, A. R. C. (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, no. 2. Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1964). Evaluation of artificially dried grass as a source of energy for sheep. II. The energy value of cocksfoot, timothy and two strains of rye-grass at varying stages of maturity. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1968). Cell bioenergetics and energy metabolism. Handb. Tierernähr. 1, 385–414. Hamburg: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Barott, H. G. & Pringle, E. M. (1946). Energy and gaseous metabolism of the chicken from hatch to maturity as affected by temperature. J. Nutr. 31, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Czerkawski, J. (1966). Modifications of the methane production of the sheep by supplementation of its diet. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 17, 417–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1961). The utilisation of food by sheep and cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57, 419–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth, p 310. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Carew, L. B. Jr, & Hill, F. W. (1964). Effect of corn oil on metabolic efficiency of energy utilization by chicks. J. Nutr. 83, 293–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carew, L. B. Jr, &Hopkins, D. T. & Nesheim, M. C. (1964). Influence of amount and type of fat on metabolic efficiency of energy utilisation by the chick. J. Nutr. 83, 300–06.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbett, J. L., Langlands, J. P., McDonald, I. & Pullar, J. D. (1966). Comparison by direct animal calorimetry of the net energy values of an early and a late season growth of herbage. Anim. Prod. 8, 13–27.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1964). The efficiency of conversion of dietary metabolizable energy to tissue energy in young chickens as measured by body analysis. Proc. Illrd Symp. Energy Metabolism, Troon, pp. 333–45. Ed. Blaxter, K. L.. E.A.A.P. publ. no. 11.Google Scholar
Deighton, T. & Hutchinson, J. C. D. (1940). Studies on the metabolism of fowls. III. The determination of the comparative nett energy of Sussex ground oats and white maize meal for fattening cockerels. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 30, 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1964). Energetic efficiency of fattening sheep. I. Utilization of low-fibre and highfibre food mixtures. Aust. J. agric. Res. 15, 100–112.Google Scholar
King, J. R. & Farner, D. S. (1964).Terrestrial animals in humid heat: birds. Handbook of Physiology. Section 4. Adaptation to the Environment, ch. 38, pp. 603–24. Washington, D.C.: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
Marion, J. E. & Woodroof, J. G. (1963). The fatty acid composition of breast, thigh and skin tissues of chicken broilers as influenced by dietary fats. Poult. Sci. 42, 1202–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. & Haines, W. T. (1927). The basal metabolism of mature chickens and the net-energy value of corn. J. agric. Res. 34, 927–43.Google Scholar
Nehring, K., Hoffmann, L. & Schiemann, R. (1963). Die energetische Verwertung der Futterstoffe. Arch. Tierernähr. 13, 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehring, K. & R, Schiemann.. (1961), The energy utilisation of nutrients by various species of animals. Vllth int. Cong. Anim. Prod., General Reports, p. 191.Google Scholar
Nehring, K., Schiemann, R. & Hoffmann, L. (1961). Die Verwertung der Futterenergie in Abhängigkeit vom Ernährungsniveau. Arch. Tierenähr. 11, 157–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehring, K., Schiemann, R., Hoffmann, L. & Jentsch, W. (1963). Die energetische Verwertung der Futterstoffe. Arch. Tierernähr. 13, 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romijn, C. & Lokhorst, W. (1961). Climate and poultry: heat regulation in the fowl. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 86, 153–72.Google Scholar
Shannon, D. W. F. & Brown, W. O. (1969). The period of adaptation of the fasting metabolic rate of the common fowl to an increase in environmental temperature from 22 °C to 28 °C. Brit. Poult. Sci. 10, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squance, E., & Brown, W. O. (1965). A study of digestibility and biological value of protein in diets fed to colostomised laying pullets to determine their protein requirement. Brit. Poult. Sci. 6, 107–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturkie, P. D. (1965). Avian Physiology, 2nd ed.Ithaca, New York: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Waring, J. J. & Brown, W. O. (1965). A respiration chamber for the study of energy utilization for maintenance and production in the laying hen. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65, 139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, J. J. & Brown, W. O. (1967). Calorimetric studies on the utilization of dietary energy by the laying White Leghorn hen in relation to plane of nutrition and environmental temperature. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar