Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T15:13:15.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship of stalk morphology and chemical composition to lodging resistance in maize (Zea mays L.) in a rainforest zone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. A. Esechie
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria

Summary

Field and laboratory studies were carried out in 1981 and 1982 to investigate the relationship of stalk morphology and chemical composition to lodging resistance in maize in the rainforest zone of Nigeria.

Morphological characters correlated with lodging were plant height, diameter and length of basal internode, thickness of rind and weight of 5 cm basal section. Lodging was negatively correlated with grain yield, and with the percentages of total nonstructural carbohydrate, protein and potassium in the stalks. Premature stalk senescence and rot were common in varieties susceptible to lodging. Lodging had no relationship with leaf area and number of days from sowing to flowering.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1970). Official Methods of Analysis, 11th edn.Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Craig, J. & Hooker, A. I. (1961). Relation of sugar trends and pith density of Diplodia stalk rot in dent corn. Phytopathology 51, 376383.Google Scholar
D'Hoore, J. L. (1964). Soil map of Africa. Publication No. 93. Commission for Technical Co-operation in Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Esechie, H. A. (1983). Relationship between lodging, certain morphological characters and yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 669673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esechie, H. A., Maranville, J. W. & Ross, W. M. (1977). Relationship of stalk morphology and chemical composition to lodging resistance in sorghum. Crop Science 17, 609612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, R. A. & Kerber, J. D. (1971). Atomic absorption and flame photometry. Techniques and uses in soils, plants and water analysis. In Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soils and Plant Tissue (ed. Walsh, L. M.), pp. 1737. Soil Science Society of America Publication.Google Scholar
Liebhardt, W. C. & Murdock, J. T. (1965). Effect of potassium on morphology and lodging of corn. Agronomy Journal 57, 325328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebhardt, W. C., Stangel, P. J. & Murdock, J. T. (1968). A mechanism for premature parenchyma breakdown in corn (Zea mays L.). Agronomy Journal 60, 496499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maranville, J. W. (1974). What's new in sorghum physiology. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 2228.Google Scholar
Matile, Ph. (1976). Vacuoles. In Plant Biochemistry (ed. Bonner, J. and Varner, J. E.), p. 209. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Remison, S. U. & Akinyele, D. (1978). Relationship between lodging, morphological characters and yield of varieties of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 633638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. (1969). Removing and analyzing total nonstructural carbohydrates from plant tissue. Research Report No. 41. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. L. (1963). Stalk strength of corn as measured by crushing strength and rind thickness. Crop Science 3, 323329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, H. K. (1930). Plant characters as indices in relation to the ability of corn strains to withstand lodging. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 22, 453458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuber, M. S. (1973). Evaluation for progress in selection for stalk quality. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 110122.Google Scholar