Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T17:28:06.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparison of the Infectivity and Pathogenicity of Trichinella spiralis Strains from Poland and Kenya*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Zbigniew Kozar
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Anthropozoonoses of the Department of Parasttology of the Polish Academy of Sciences and Department of Parasitology, Veterinary Faculty, Wroclaw, Poland
Maria Kozar
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Anthropozoonoses of the Department of Parasttology of the Polish Academy of Sciences and Department of Parasitology, Veterinary Faculty, Wroclaw, Poland

Extract

1. A lower pathogenicity of the Kenya strain of T. spiralis was substantiated in mice as compared with our laboratory strain; infection with a dose of 2,000 larvae from the laboratory strain resulted in the death of all the animals, whereas 7 out of 10 and 6 out of 20 mice infected with the Kenya strain survived.

2. The reason for the lower pathogenicity of the Kenya strain is related to its weaker infectivity; after the infection with 200 larvae of the Kenya strain the number of muscle larvae produced was half (on average 17,595 larvae) that of the laboratory strain (average 32,792 larvae).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bachman, G. W., and Oliver-Gonzalez, J., 1934.—“Virulence of Trichinella spiralis in a natural and in an experimental host.” Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 32, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrester, A. T. T., Nelson, G. S., and Sander, G., 1901.—“The first record of an outbreak of Trichinosis in Africa, South of the Sahara.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 55, 503513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozar, Z. and Kozar, M., 1903.—“The course of experimental Trichinellosis in mice. Methods of infection and the influence of various invasive doses on the mortality and weight of the animals.” Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne, 9, 403418.Google Scholar
McCoy, O. R., 1931.—“Immunity of rats to reinfection with Trichinella spiralis.” Am. J. Hyg., 14, 484494.Google Scholar
McCoy, O. R., 1935.—“Artificial immunization of rats against Trichinella spiralis”, 21, 200213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, O. R., 1936.—“The development of trichinae in abnormal environments.” J. Parasit, 22, 5459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, O. R., 1939.—“Immunity to trichinosis in rats.” Vol. Jub. pro prof. Sadao Yoshida, 2, 339341.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. S., Guggisberg, C. W. A. and Mukundi, J., 1963.—“Animal hosts of Trichinella spiralis in East Africa.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 57, 332346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, G. S., and Mukundi, J., 1963.—“A strain of Trichinella spiralis from Kenya of low infectivity to rats and domestic pigs.” J. Helminth., 37, 329338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver-Gonzalez, J., 1941.—“The effect on virulence of Trichinella spiralis from passage through rabbits, guineapigs and rats.” Puerto Rico J. Pub. Health. 17, 6163.Google Scholar
Rappaport, I., 1943.—“A comparison of three strains of Trichinella spiralis. I. Pathogenicity and extent of larval development in the musculature. II. Longevity and sex ratio of adults in the intestine and rapidity of larval development in the musculature.” Am. J. trop. Med., 23, 343350 and 351362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trawinski, A., 1935.—“Studien über Immunität bei Trichonose.” Zbl. Bakt., I. Orig., 134, 145149.Google Scholar
Zimoroi, I. Yu., 1963.—“Izmenenie virulentnosti trikhinell pri ich passaghe ot plotoyadnych k gryzunam.” Gelminty tscheloveka, zhivotnych i rastenij i borba s nimi. K 85–letiu akad. K. I.Skrjabina, Moskwa, 7174.Google Scholar