Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:32:45.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trade and Political Dominion in South India, 1750–1790: Changing British—Indian Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

S. Arasaratnam
Affiliation:
University of New England

Extract

The English East India Company's Coromandel trade provided a spectacle of steady, if unspectacular, growth from its first inauguration early in the seventeenth century. It was not subject to the violent ups and downs, or the extremes of great success and utter failure that characterized the Company's trade in some other regions of India and Southeast Asia. An expanding trade on this coast was matched by an expanding presence. By the end of the century it was well-founded in two substantial Forts (St George and St David) and a number of residencies in important ports of outlet from Vizagapatnam in the north to Cuddalore in the south. By investment and enterprise, by diplomacy and force, English interests and influence on the coast grew and their settlements became nodal points of Indo-British exchange and interaction. The timely demonstration of controlled power, both when faced with threats from the ‘country’ powers of the hinterland and from European rivals on the seafront, helped in the growth of these settlements beyond mere centres of trade. Providing, as they did, not merely trade and investment, but also security of person and property, they were naturally an attraction to many groups in Indian society in the hinterland.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Most of the research for this paper was undertaken when I was Smuts Visiting Fellow at the University of Cambridge. I am grateful to the University and to the Managers of the Smuts Memorial Fund for the facilities afforded to me during that period.

1 These general statements are based on the cumulative evidence of relations with Indian merchants as revealed in the Diary and Consultation Books for Fort St George and Fort St David that are available for the period c. 16501750.Google Scholar

2 Brennig, Joseph J., ‘Chief Merchants and European Enclaves of Seventeenth-Century Coromandel’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. XI, Pt 3 (07 1977), pp. 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Evidence for this is circumstantial and is inferred from Dutch reports of the textile markets in Malacca, East Sumatran ports and Bantam.Google Scholar

4 Letters to Thos Pitt, British Museum: Add. Ms. 22852 f149.Google Scholar

5 ‘Cashia Chittee Andeapa deceased. His Accounts’. Berkshire Records Office. D/EBY B7. I am indebted to Mr I. Bruce Watson of the Australian National University for drawing my attention to this valuable document. Mr Watson is working on English private trade in India in this period and his work should throw much light on these unofficial relationships.Google Scholar

6 ‘Humble Petition of Jaggoo and Chengalroyah to Dy. Governor and Council of Fort St. George [September 1750].’ Letters to Fort St. David, Vol. II (Madras, 1935).Google Scholar

7 Love, , Vestiges of Old Madras, Vol. II (London, 1913), pp. 273–4.Google Scholar

8 Private Diary of Ananda Ranga Pillai, ed. by Price, and Dodwell, , 12 vols (Madras, 19041928).Google Scholar

9 Madras Public Proceedings [henceforth M.P.P.] July–December 1781, 240/53, Minutes of Proceedings of Council, 7 December 1781, 31 December 1781.Google Scholar

10 The Trial of Avadanum Paupiah, Brahmin, Dubash to John Holland Esq. Late Governor of Fort St. George and to his brother Edward Holland Esq. Late Member of Council thereof… for a conspiracy against David Haliburton Esq. a senior merchant in the service of the East India Company… (Calcutta, 1792).Google Scholar

11 Love, , Vestiges of Old Madras, II, 180.Google Scholar

12 M.P.P. January–July 1771, 240/31, Minutes of Council, 12 July 1771.Google Scholar

13 M.P.P. January–July 1765, 240/23, Minutes of Council, 25 February 1765.Google Scholar

14 Richards, J. F., Mughal Administration in Golconda (Oxford, 1975), pp. 1728.Google Scholar

15 For a discussion of this debate, though primarily from a Bengal viewpoint, see Marshall, P. J., ‘British Expansion in India’, History, Vol. 60 (1975), pp. 2843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 General State of Receipts and Disbursements at Fort St George. Third Report from the Committee of Secrecy on the State of the East India Company. Reports of the House of Commons, Vol. 4, 1772, 1773, pp. 62–3.Google Scholar

17 Fourth Report from the Committee of Secrecy on the State of the East India Company. Reports of the House of Commons, Vol. 7, 1782, p. 621.Google Scholar

18 Pritchard, E. H., The Crucial Years of Early Anglo-Chinese Relations 1750–1800 (Pullman, Washington, 1936), passim.Google Scholar

19 Third Report from the Committee of Secrecy on the State of the East India Company. Reports of the House of Commons, Vol. 7, 1782, pp. 622–5.Google Scholar

20 M.P.P. January–July 1775, 240/39, Minutes of Council, 19 January 1775.Google Scholar

21 M.P.P. January–July 1775, 240/39, Minutes of Council, 16 January 1775.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., Minutes of Council, 23 January 1775, 3 February 1775.

23 Ibid., Minutes of Council, 3 February 1775.

24 M.P.P. 1768, 240/26, Minutes of Council, 11 April 1768; M.P.P. 1769, 240/28, Minutes of Council, 19 April 1767.Google Scholar

25 M.P.P. 1768, 240/26, Minutes of Council, 23 February 1768.Google Scholar

27 M.P.P. 1771, 240/31, Court of Directors to Fort St George, 17 March 1769, Minutes of 2 May 1771.Google Scholar

28 M.P.P. 1771, 240/31, Minutes of Council, 2 May 1771.Google Scholar

29 M.P.P. 1771, 240/32, Minutes of Council, 2 December 1771.Google Scholar

31 Ibid., Diary of the Proceedings of a journey through weaving villages in the Hon. Company's Jaghirs. Minutes of Council, 27 December 1771.

33 M.P.P. 1772, 240/34, Report of Export Warehousekeeper, Minutes of Council, 20 November 1772.Google Scholar

35 M.P.P. 1773, 240/35, Minutes of Council, 18 June 1773.Google Scholar

36 M.P.P. 1774, 240/37, Minutes of Council, 4 March 1774.Google Scholar

37 M.P.P. 1774, 240/38, Minutes of Council, 26 september 1774, 1 October 1774.Google Scholar

38 M.P.P. 1775, 240/39, Minutes of Council, 7 April 1775, 12 July 1775, 30 August 1775.Google Scholar

39 M.P.P. 1776, 240/41, Report of Special Committee, 26 December 1775.Google Scholar

40 M.P.P. 1776, 240/42, Agreements with merchants at Ingeram, 5 September 1776, Minutes of Council, 1 October 1776.Google Scholar

41 M.P.P. 1776, 240/41, Report of Export Warehousekeeper, Minutes of Council, 22 July 1776.Google Scholar

43 M.P.P. 1778, 240/45, Minutes of Council, 10 February 1778, 20 February 1778.Google Scholar

44 M.P.P. 1778, 240/45, Nawab to Governor, 5 May 1778.Google Scholar

45 M.P.P. 1778, 240/45, Nawab to Governor, 22 May 1778.Google Scholar

46 M.P.P. 1778, 240/46, Nawab to Governor, 17 June 1778.Google Scholar

47 M.P.P. 1783, 240/60, Skardon to Governor, 31 March 1785; 240/61 Skardon to Governor, 26 July 1785, 8 August 1785.Google Scholar

48 Furber, H., John Company at Work (Cambridge, Mass., 1948), pp. 160206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 It was these interests that pioneered the search for a British settlement in the Malay Penninsula which resulted in the founding of Penang (1786).Google Scholar

50 M.P.P. 1782, 240/55, Minutes of Council, 4 October 1782, 12 October 1782 Inhabitants [English] of Madras to Governor, 11 October 1782.Google Scholar

51 M.P.P. 1782, 240/55, Petition from Native merchants trading in grain to Governor, 11 November 1782. M.P.P. 1784, 240/58, Petition of Northward Grain Merchants, Minutes 17 April 1784.Google Scholar

52 M.P.P. 1784, 240/58, Minutes of Council, 30 March 1784.Google Scholar

53 M.P.P. 1786, 240/65, Board of Trade to Governor, 7 October 1786.Google Scholar

54 M.P.P.1787, 240/3, Translated order of Raja Jaggapetty Rauze, 27 July 1787.Google Scholar

55 M.P.P. 1780, 240/51, Minutes of Council, 29 July 1780.Google Scholar

56 M.P.P. 1780, 240/51, Minutes of Council, 25 August 1780, 1781; 240/53, Minutes of Council, 2 August 1781.Google Scholar