Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T10:55:39.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frederick Cook's polar journey: a reconstruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Randall J. Osczevski
Randall J. Osczevski
Affiliation:
22 Foothills Drive, Nepean, Ontario, CanadaK2H 6K3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The data used by Dr Frederick A. Cook in support of his claim to have reached the North Pole on 21 April 1908 are reinterpreted to support a hypothesis that Cook did not reach the Pole, that his journey towards the Pole lasted only one week, and thathe subsequently discovered and visited Meighen Island. This reconstruction explains how Dr Cook could have made observations of ice conditions and drift, and of an ice island, without having travelled far out on the Arctic Ocean. A possible reason for his failure to announce discovery of Meighen Island is also offered.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 26 , Issue 158 , July 1990 , pp. 225 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balkwill, H. R. 1983. Geology of Amund Ringnes, Cornwall and Haig-Thomas islands, District of Franklin. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 390.Google Scholar
Cook, F. A. 1911. My attainment of the Pole. New York, Mitchell KennerlyGoogle Scholar
Cook, F. A. 1951. Return from the Pole (edited by Pohl, F. J.). New York, Pellegrini and Cuddahy.Google Scholar
Gibbons, R. W. 1968, Cook: an American Dreyfus in the Arctic? North 2:42.Google Scholar
Helgesen, H. T. 1916. Dr Cook and the North Pole. Extension of remarks in the House of Representatives. Appendix to the Congressional Record, 4 September 1916. Reprinted in Fram (1987) 4: 2685–731.Google Scholar
Herbert, W. 1968. Across the top of the world. London, Longmans.Google Scholar
Herbert, W. 1989. The noose of laurels: Peary, Cook, and the race to the North Pole. London, Atheneum.Google Scholar
Hunt, W. R. 1981. To stand at the Pole. New York, Stein and Day.Google Scholar
Kennan, G. 1909. Arctic work and Arctic food. The Outlook 16 10: 338–42. Reprinted in Fram (1987) 4: 46–52.Google Scholar
Lee, H. P. 1928. Policing the Arctic. Toronto, McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
MacMillan, D. B. 1918. New evidence that Cook did not reach the Pole. Geographical Review 5: 140.Google Scholar
MacMillan, D. B. 1925. Four years in the white north. Revised edition. Medici Society of America, Boston and New York.Google Scholar
MacMillan, D. B. 1934. How Peary reached the Pole. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Osczevski, R. J. 1986. Trial run: a test of an unconventional concept for trials of cold-weather clothing. Defence Research Establishment Ottawa, Report 945.Google Scholar
Prach, R. W., Smith, A. R. and Dzubin, A. 1986. Nesting of the common eider near Hell Gate, Cardigan Strait polynia, 1980–81. In: Reed, A. (editor). Eider ducks in Canada. Canadian Wildlife Service Report Series 47.Google Scholar
Rawlins, D. 1973. Peary at the North Pole: fact or fiction? Washington, R. B. Luce.Google Scholar
Serson, H. V. 1974. Sverdrup Channel. Defence Research Establishment Ottawa, Technical Notes 74–10.Google Scholar
Stallworthy, H. W. 1932. Patrol report, Krueger search. Public Archives Canada, RG 85, vol 756, file 4725–2.Google Scholar
Stefansson, V. 1939. The problem of Meighen Island. New York, privately printed.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsson, R. 1960. The history and geology of Meighen Island. Geobgical Survey of Canada Bulletin 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. 1970. The big nail. New York, John Day.Google Scholar