Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T16:58:47.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global interdependence and Arctic voices: capacity-building for sustainable livelihoods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Mark Nuttall
Mark Nuttall
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology/Northern Studies Centre, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen AB24 3QY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years the concept of capacity-building or capacity development has evolved to help policymakers frame crucial questions about how sustainability can be achieved. However, like sustainable development, capacity-building proves difficult to define, as it encompasses human, technological, educational, organisational, scientific, cultural, financial, and institutional aspects. This article suggests that capacity-building is an approach to sustainable development, its main goal being to enhance the capabilities of people and institutions to improve their skills and abilities to solve problems, define their needs, and strengthen their prospects for achieving sustainable livelihoods. Capacity-building is now a key objective for the Arctic Council — indeed, the Council sees it as a necessary element for both the achievement of sustainable development and for co-operation at circumpolar and wider international levels. The Arctic Council has charged its Sustainable Development Working Group to draft a capacity-building implementation strategy. The overall aim of a capacity-building implementation strategy will be to enhance the Arctic Council's own effectiveness in managing its own structures and developing programmes and activities, and also to shape a capacitybuilding role for the Council in international affairs. This article offers some perspectives on the kinds of critical issues an Arctic Council capacity-building strategy should be concerned with, such as skills, knowledge, well-being, gender equality, and the barriers to capacity-building for sustainable livelihoods. A test of the effectiveness of such a strategy will be how far it strengthens the capacity of the peoples of the Arctic to achieve sustainable livelihoods and how the Arctic Council can build its own capacity to be an enabling environment for Arctic voices to be heard in circumpolar and international contexts.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 38 , Issue 206 , July 2002 , pp. 194 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, C., and Scrivener, D.. 2000. International cooperation in the Arctic environment. In: Nuttall, M., and Callaghan, T. V. (editors). The Arctic: environment, people, policy. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P., and Finger, M.. 1994. The Earth brokers: power, politics and world development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Commission on Sustainable Development. 1996. Capacity-building for sustainable development. New York: United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Eade, D. 1997. Capacity-building: an approach to people-centred development. Oxford: Oxfam Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, L. 1998. The global politics of the environment. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahan, R. 1995. The elusive agenda: mainstreaming women in development. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Klinger, J. 1994. Debt-for-nature swaps and the limits to international cooperation on behalf of the environment. Environmental Politics 3 (2): 229–246.Google Scholar
Lange, M. A., Cohen, S. J., and Kuhry, P.. 1999. Integrated global change impact studies in the Arctic: the role of the stakeholders. Polar Research 18 (2): 389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipschutz, R. D., and Conca, K. (editors). 1993. The state and social power in global environmental politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Litfin, K. 1993. Eco-regimes: playing tug of war with the nation-state. In: Lipschutz, R. D., and Conca, K. (editors). The state and social power in global environmental politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. 1998. Protecting the Arctic: indigenous peoples and cultural survival. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. 2000a. Indigenous peoples' organisations and Arctic environmental co-operation. In: Nuttall, M., and Callaghan, T. V. (editors). The Arctic: environment, people, policy. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. 2000 b. Barriers to the sustainable uses of living marine resources in Vestnorden. In: Allansson, J. G., and Edvardsson, I. R. (editors). Community viability, rapid change and socio-ecological futures. Akureyri: University of Akureyri and Stefansson Arctic Institute.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. 2001. Indigenous peoples and climate change research in the Arctic. Indigenous Affairs 4 (1): 26–33.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M., and Callaghan, T. V.. 2000. Introduction. In: Nuttall, M., and Callaghan, T. V. (editors). The Arctic: environment, people, policy. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Schalkwyk, J., Thomas, H., and Woroniuk, B.. 1996. Mainstreaming: a strategy for achieving equality between women and men. Stockholm: Sida.Google Scholar
UNDP. 1998. Capacity assessment and development in a systems and strategic management context. New York: United Nations Development Program, Management Development and Governance Division (Technical advisory paper 3).Google Scholar
World Bank. 1997. Partnership for capacity-building in Africa: a progress report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. 1996. The Arctic Council: marking a new era in international relations. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. 1998. Creating an Arctic sustainable development strategy. Paper delivered as the first Stefansson Memorial Lecture, Stefansson Arctic Institute, Akureyri, Iceland, 8 December 1998.Google Scholar