Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T16:16:33.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalisation and development in a post-nomadic hunter/gatherer Alaskan village: a follow-up assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

Steven C. Dinero
Steven C. Dinero*
Affiliation:
School of Liberal Arts, School House Lane and Henry Avenue, Philadelphia University, Philadelphia PA 19144, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using data collected in the Gwich'in Athabascan community of Vashraii K'oo/Arctic Village, an examination of how the village has continued to develop and evolve as a native space since its initial creation in 1908, is presented. Data collected using a household survey in 2006 is compared with data that was collected in a 1999 survey in order to address and measure such issues as: the village residents’ economic standing and subsistence activities; satisfaction with the planning and governance of the village; and residents’ overall attitudes toward the degree to which their village continues to function as an ‘ethnic space’. The previous conclusion (Dinero 2005) was that these villagers have responded relatively well to globalising forces, effectively bridging the native and white worlds in a manner which allows them to live in both, yet to retain a strong sense of their identity and cultural values despite residence in a settled, post-nomadic setting. While this remains the case, one cannot overlook in the present research the sense of loss of past lifeways that has resulted from the changes brought on by new technologies, despite any positive benefits deriving therefrom. Therefore, the conclusion of this paper is the suggestion that the development of this ‘hybridised’ Alaska native is still very much in process, as these people strive to adapt to the new challenges presented by their ever-changing environment.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 255 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alaska Division of Community Advocacy. 2006. URL: http://www.commerce.state.ak.us/dca/commdb/CF_BLOCK.cfm (Accessed 25 July 2006).Google Scholar
Campbell, K., Parrott, M., Desrochers, M., Hewko, P., and Schmetzer, M.. 2005. Yukon flats regional government feasibility study. Fairbanks: University of Alaska (University of Alaska Fairbanks Engineering Science Management and Civil Engineering Departments).Google Scholar
Castells, M. 1997. The power of identity (The information age: economy, society and culture. Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Craver, A. 2001. Inupiaq Eskimo household structure: social organization and domestic function. Unpublished paper presented at the fourth congress of the International Arctic Social Sciences Association, Quebec City, Quebec. May 2001.Google Scholar
Dinero, S.C. 2003. ‘The Lord will provide’: the history and role of Episcopalian Christianity in Nets'aii Gwich'in social development – Arctic Village, Alaska. Indigenous Nations Studies Journal 4 (1): 3–28.Google Scholar
Dinero, S.C. 2004a. Analysis of a ‘mixed economy’ in an Alaskan native settlement: the case of Arctic Village. Canadian Journal of Native Studies 33 (1): 135–164.Google Scholar
Dinero, S.C. 2004b. The politics of education provision in rural native Alaska: the case of Yukon Village. Race, Ethnicity and Education 7 (4): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinero, S.C. 2005. Globalization and development in a post-nomadic hunter/gatherer village: the case of Arctic Village, Alaska. The Northern Review 25/26: 135–160.Google Scholar
Dinero, S.C., McGee, T., Bhagat, P., and Mariotz, E.. 2006. Website development and Alaska native identities: hunting for meaning in cyberspace. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society 2 (1): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinero, S.C., Mariotz, E., and Bhagat, P.. 2007. Bridging the technology gap: building a development model for Rural Alaska. Journal of Cultural Geography 24 (2), in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Orso, M. 2006. Eagle blue: a team, a tribe, and a high school basketball season in Arctic Alaska. New York and London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Fast, P.A. 2002. Northern Athabascan survival: women, community, and the future. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Frank, K. 2003. Vaa Tserii'in, funny Gwich'in stories and games. Arctic Anthropology 40 (2): 56–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haycox, S.W. 2002. Alaska: an American colony. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Kollin, S. 2001. Nature's state: imagining Alaska as the last frontier. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McPhee, J. 1977. Coming into the country. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Mason, A. 2002. The rise of an Alaskan native bourgeoisie. Inuit Studies 26 (2): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, C. (editor). 2001. Neerihiinjik – We traveled from place to place. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center, 2nd Edition.Google Scholar
Morseth, C.M. 1997. Twentieth-century changes in Beluga whale hunting and butchering by the Kanigmiut of Buckland, Alaska. Arctic 50 (3): 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, M. 2005. Hunting, herding, fishing and gathering: indigenous peoples and renewable resource use in the Arctic. URL: www.acia.uaf.udu (Pre-release version, 9 May 2005).Google Scholar
Robards, M., and Alessa, L.. 2004. Timescapes of community resilience and vulnerability in the circumpolar north. Arctic 57 (4): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C., and Ward, G.K.. 2001. Indigenous cultures in an interconnected world. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, R., Williams, D., and Peterson, G.. 2003. Culture Loss and Sense of Place in Resource Valuation: Economics, Anthropology and Indigenous Cultures. In: Jentoft, S., Minde, H., and Nilsen, R. (editors). Indigenous peoples: resource management and global rights. Delft: Eburon Publishers: 107–123.Google Scholar
Stewart, A.M., Keith, D., and Scottie, J.. 2004. Caribou crossings and cultural meanings: placing traditional knowledge and archaeology in context in an Inuit landscape. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11 (2): 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Agricultural Experiment. 1978. Yukon-Porcupine regional planning study. Fairbanks: Station-School of Agriculture and Land Resources Management and the Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska for the U. S. Forest Service.Google Scholar
Wein, E.E., and Freeman, M.R.M.. 1995. Frequency of traditional food use by three Yukon first nations living in four communities. Arctic 48 (2)161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar