Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T04:39:32.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Norway's rule on Svalbard: tightening the grip on the Arctic islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Torbjørn Pedersen
Torbjørn Pedersen*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the last four decades, Norwegian rule on the Svalbard islands has developed gradually, from being virtually non-existent to firm. This study explains these developments in Norwegian jurisdiction both from a perspective of international relations and within a paradigm of domestic politics. It finds that external forces have been the permissive causes of change, while internal forces represent the efficient causes. Norway's incremental strengthening of jurisdiction, notably from the mid-1970s onward, has resulted in an unprecedented Norwegian grip on the Arctic islands in which the other parties to the 1920 Svalbard Treaty seemingly acquiesce.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 147 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, G., and Zelikow, P.. 1999. Essence of decision. Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Andrade, L., and Young, G.. 1996. Presidential agenda setting: influences on the emphasis of foreign policy. Political Research Quarterly 49 (3): 591–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arlov, T.B. 2003. Svalbards historie. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Arlov, T.B., Holm, A.O., and Moe, K.. 2001. Fra company town til folkestyre. Samfunnsbygging l Longyearbyen på 78 ° nord. Longyearbyen: Svalbard samfunnsdrift.Google Scholar
Carlsnaes, W. 2005. Foreign policy. In: Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T., and Simmons, B.A. (editors). Handbook of international relations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fleischer, K.A. 1983. Petroleumsrett. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Fogt, A. 1975. Sovjets greb om Svalbard lige så fas som Norges: Norge har problemer med at opretholde suveræniteten på Svalbard. Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten 15 November 1975.Google Scholar
Frydenlund, K. 1982. Lille land – hva nå? Refleksjoner om Norges utenrikspolitiske situasjon. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R.G. 1986. The richness of the tradition of political realism. In: Keohane, R.O. (editor). Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press: 301–321.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1996. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, K.J. 1992. International politics: a framework for analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Inderberg, T.H. 2007. Den utenrikspolitiske håndteringen av Elektronsaken. Kompetent realpolitikk eller kompetansestrid? Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institutt.Google Scholar
Moe, A. 1983. Utenrikspolitiske rammebetingelser og norsk Svalbard-politikk. Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen-stiftelsen på Polhøgda (report 3).Google Scholar
Nilsen, O. 2001. Det politisk-administrative system og Svalbard-politikken. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Norway. 1974–1975. Norwegian Ministry of Justice. White paper. Report No. 39 to the Storting.Google Scholar
Norway. 1986. Norwegian Ministry of Justice, 1985–1986. White paper. Report No. 40 to the Storting.Google Scholar
Norway. 1999. Norwegian Ministry of Justice, 1999–2000. White paper. Report No. 9 to the Storting.Google Scholar
Olsen, J.P. 1972. Public policy-making and theories of organizational choice. Scandinavian Political Studies 7: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østreng, W. 1975. Det politiske Svalbard. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.Google Scholar
Peake, J.S. 2001. Presidential agenda setting in foreign policy. Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, T. 2002. Verneplanen utsatt. Svalbardposten 54 (45), 15 November 2002.Google Scholar
Pedersen, T. 2008a. The constrained politics of the Svalbard offshore area. Marine Policy 32 (6): 913–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, T. 2008b. Conflict and order in Svalbard waters. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Pedersen, T. 2008c. The dynamics of Svalbard diplomacy. Diplomacy and Statecraft 19 (2): 236–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, G. 1998. Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics 51 (1): 144–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russia. 2002a. Diplomatic note handed to Norway, 15 October 2002.Google Scholar
Russia. 2002b. Diplomatic note handed to Norway, 18 October 2002.Google Scholar
Shaw, M.N. 1991. International law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thucydides. 1972. History of the Peloponnesian war. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Treaty. 1920. Treaty concerning the archipelago of Spitsbergen (adopted 9 February 1920, entered into force 14 August 1925). In: 2 League of Nations Treaty Series (LNTS) 7.Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G. 1995. The Svalbard Treaty: from ‘terra nullius’ to Norwegian sovereignty. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of international politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Wood, B.D., and Peake, J.S. 1998. The dynamics of foreign policy agenda setting. The American Political Science Review 92 (1): 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R.K. 2003. Case study research. Design and methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar