Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:37:16.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International interdisciplinary Arctic research: Case study of the Russian Arctic biomonitoring mega-grant project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2023

Tatiana Yu Sorokina Open the ORCID record for Tatiana Yu Sorokina [Opens in a new window] ,
Lyubov Zarubina ,
Maxim Gutenev  and
Elena Kudryashova
Tatiana Yu Sorokina*
Affiliation:
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia
Lyubov Zarubina
Affiliation:
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia
Maxim Gutenev
Affiliation:
South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia
Elena Kudryashova
Affiliation:
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia
*
Corresponding author: Tatiana Yu Sorokina; Email: tatianak83@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Arctic region is commonly seen as a territory of international dialogue and cooperation. This perception is largely due to the science diplomacy efforts that are largely being contributed by universities, scientific centres, research teams and individual scholars. This paper discusses the Arctic science diplomacy initiatives proposed by Russia’s northernmost federal university. Of particular interest is the case of establishing in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation of national biological monitoring network – the initiative supported by the government-funded mega-grant programme. Our analysis suggests that two pillars of science diplomacy – “science for diplomacy” and “diplomacy for science” – can be successfully combined within the framework of one project. Evidence is provided of the pursuit of national interests being not a limiting factor but rather a driver in the process of promoting diplomatic collaborations in science, serving as a third science diplomacy pillar. Significant progress towards ensuring peace and harmony in the Arctic and sustaining international dialogue on science-based responses to global challenges has been achieved through science diplomacy initiatives proposed by Northern (Arctic) Federal University (NArFU). The authors confirm that most effective tools for establishing good neighbourly relations in the Arctic and promoting international cooperation are offered by scientific discussion.

Keywords

Arctic science diplomacyArctic biomonitoringscience diplomacyinternational scientific collaborationinterdisciplinary approachproject managementRussian policy
Type
Review Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 59 , 2023 , e28
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation. (2017). Retrieved May 16, 2020, from https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/1916.Google Scholar
AMAP. (2004). Persistent Toxic Substances, Food Security and Indigenous Peoples of the Russian North. Final Report. Oslo, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, 192 p.Google Scholar
AMAP. (2009). AMAP Assessment 2009: Human Health in the Arctic. Oslo, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Xiv+254 pp.Google Scholar
AMAP. (2015). AMAP Assessment 2015: Human Health in the Arctic. Oslo, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, vii + 165 pp.Google Scholar
AMAP. (2016). Temporal Trends in Persistent Organic Pollutants in the Arctic. AMAP Assessment 2015. Oslo, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.Google Scholar
AMAP. (2017). AMAP Assessment 2016: Chemicals of Emerging Arctic Concern. Oslo, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.Google Scholar
AMAP. (2018). Biological Effects of Contaminants on Arctic Wildlife and Fish. Tromsø, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP).Google Scholar
Antjushina, N. M. (2013). Mnogolikaja Arktika [Agreement on scientific cooperation in the Arctic came into force The Many Faces of the Arctic]. Sovremennaja Evropa, 2(54), 34–46. (in Russian)Google Scholar
Avdonina, N. S., Kudryashova, E. V., & Zaikov, K. S. (2019). Terrae Novae: The tenth scientific and educational expedition ‘Arctic floating university’. The Polar Journal, 9(2), 473–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC. (2020). Russian Arctic oil spill pollutes big lake near Norilsk. Retrieved August 5, 2020, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52977740.Google Scholar
Berkman, P. A., Kullerud, L., Pope, A., Vylegzhanin, A. N., & Young, O. R. (2017). The Arctic science agreement propels science diplomacy. Science, 358(6363), 596–598.Google ScholarPubMed
Davis, L. S., & Patman, R. G. (2015). Science Diplomacy: New Day or False Dawn? Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 296 p.Google Scholar
Fedoroff, N. (2009). Science diplomacy in the 21st century. Cell, 136(1), 9–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gast, A. P. (2021). A foreign policy for universities: Science diplomacy as part of a strategy. Retrieved February 23, 2021, from https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2021/foreign-policy-for-universities-science-diplomacy-part-strategy.Google Scholar
Government Meeting. (2016). The Russian government. October 20, 2016. Retrieved March 23, 2021, from http://government.ru/all/24953/.Google Scholar
Haines, D. A., Saravanabhavan, G., Werry, K., & Khoury, C. (2017). An overview of human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals in the Canadian Health Measures Survey: 2007–2019. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 220(2), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harlamp’eva, N. K. (2017). Mezhdunarodnoe nauchnoe sotrudnichestvo v Arktike [International scientific cooperation in the Arctic]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University. 144 p. (in Russian)Google Scholar
Heininen, L. (2020). Overview of Arctic policies and strategies. Arktika i Sever [Arctic and North], 39, 195–202.Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.Google ScholarPubMed
Interlaboratory Comparison. (2021). Science direct. Retrieved January 13, 2021 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/interlaboratory-comparison.Google Scholar
International Arctic Forum. (2022). Arctic territory of dialogue. Retrieved March 12, 2022, from https://forumarctica.ru/.Google Scholar
Kalinina, M., & Zarubina, L. (2015). International Arctic cooperation: Experience of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. The Arctic Herald, 3(14), 92–101.Google Scholar
Krasnyak, O. (2018). The Apollo–Soyuz test project: Construction of an ideal type of science diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 13, 410–431. doi: 10.1163/1871191X-12341028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhmanov, D., Varakina, Y., Aksenov, A., Sorokina, T., Sobolev, N., Kotsur, D., … Thomassen, Y. (2020). Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in fish consumed by the indigenous peoples from Nenets autonomous Okrug. Environments, 7(1), 3. doi: 10.3390/environments7010003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebedeva, M. M. (Ed.) (2017). Publichnaya diplomatiya: Teoriya i praktika: nauchnoe izdanie [Public Diplomacy: Theory and Practice: Scientific Publication]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 272 p.Google Scholar
Mega-Grants. (2021). An international scientific cooperation program. Retrieved January 25, 2021 from https://p220.ru/en/.Google Scholar
Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 240 p.Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success In World Politics. New-York: Public Affairs, 192 P.Google Scholar
Priority 2030. (2021). Leaders are made, not born. Retrieved October 1, 2021, from https://priority2030.ru/en/about.Google Scholar
Project 5-100. (2021). Russian Academic excellence project. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from https://5top100.ru/en/.Google Scholar
Publications. (2021). Arctic Biomonitoring laboratory. Retrieved March 12, 2021 from https://narfu.ru/biomonitoring/en/results/.Google Scholar
RIA. (2021). The Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced a deep crisis in relations with the UK. (Available only in Russian). Retrieved March 25, 2021 from https://ria.ru/20210325/krizis-1602784365.html.Google Scholar
Ruffini, P.-B. (2020). Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: A critical review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7, Article number 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russia Today. (2021). Relations between Russia & US have shifted from ‘rivalry’ to ‘confrontation’ & are back to Cold War level – ex-president Medvedev. Retrieved April 23, 2021 from https://www.rt.com/russia/521894-cold-war-confrontation-medvedev/.Google Scholar
Scopus. (2022). Thomassen, Yngvar. Retrieved March 12, 2022, from: https://www.scopus.com.Google Scholar
SDWG. Sustainable Development Working Group. (2022). Retrieved January 27, 2022, from https://sdwg.org/about/.Google Scholar
Sobolev, N., Aksenov, A., Sorokina, T., Chashchin, V., Ellingsen, D. G., Nieboer, E., … Thomassen, Y. (2019). Essential and non-essential trace elements in fish consumed by indigenous peoples of the European Russian Arctic. Environmental Pollution, 253, 966–973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobolev, N., Ellingsen, D. G., Belova, N., Aksenov, A., Sorokina, T., Trofimova, A., … Thomassen, Y. (2021). Essential and non-essential elements in biological samples of inhabitants residing in Nenets autonomous Okrug of the Russian Arctic. Environment International, 152, 106510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorokina, T. Y. (2019). A national system of biological monitoring in the Russian Arctic as a tool for the implementation of the Stockholm convention. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorokina, T. Y. (2022). Pollution and monitoring in the Arctic. In Finger, M. & Rekvig, G. (Eds.), Global Arctic (pp. 229–253). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Northern Dimension (ND). (2022). Retrieved January 27, 2022, from https://northerndimension.info/about-northern-dimension/.Google Scholar
The Royal Society, The American Association for the Advancement of Science (2010). New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
Turekian, V. C., & Neureiter, N. P. (2012). Science and diplomacy: The past as prologue. Retrieved January 21, 2022 from https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2012/science-and-diplomacy.Google Scholar
Varakina, Y., Aksenov, A. S., Lakhmanov, D., Trofimova, A., Korobitsyna, N., Belova, N., … Thomassen, Y. (2022). Geographic and ethnic variations in serum concentrations of legacy persistent organic pollutants among men in the Nenets autonomous Okrug, Arctic Russia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 1379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varakina, Y., Lakhmanov, D., Aksenov, A., Trofimova, A., Korobitsyna, R., Belova, N., … Thomassen, Y. (2021). Concentrations of persistent organic pollutants in women’s serum in the European Arctic Russia. Toxics, 9, 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (2017). One Health. Retrieved January 27, 2021, from https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/one-health.Google Scholar
Zaikov, K. S., Zarubina, L. A., Popkova, S. V., Kuprikov, N. M., Kuprikov, M. Y., & Doronin, D. O. (2022). Innovative scientific and educational projects of the Barents euro-Arctic region as a resource for the development of interregional cooperation in the Arctic. In Arctic Fever: Political, Economic and Environmental Aspects, Palgrave Macmillan, Springer (e-book), pp. 529–554. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-9616-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarubina, L. A., Popkova, S. V., & Kudryashova, E. V. (2021). University as a think tank for international projects activity in the Arctic. European and National Dimension of Research. Humanities Electronic Collected Materials of XIII Junior Researchers’ Conference, Novopolotsk, 17–21 May, 2021, 179, pp. 67–70.Google Scholar