Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T03:50:20.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When the desert floods: Military relief work, attributing clean-up responsibility, and future helping intentions following the Katherine flood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Tracey Tann
Tracey Tann*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Northern Territory University, Darwin NT 0909
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Attribution theory has seldom been applied to assess the impact of community disaster relief work on military personnel, despite a clear prediction from Actor-Observer theory that direct experience of the community's environment will increase helpers' motivation to help in future crises. In the wake of the Northern Territory's Katherine River Flood in January 1998, 31 Royal Australian Army relief workers and 21 army personnel not posted to relief work attributed responsibility for cleaning-up homes, shops and businesses in the recently flood-affected South Pacific communities of Katherine, Townsville, and the Cook Islands. Direct experience of disaster relief work was not associated with any systematic differences in dispositional or situational attributions, although the latter were generally linked to intention to help in future crises. Occasional rumours of negative critical incidents with the local community, although rare considering the magnitude of the relief effort, may have partly coloured the experience of seeing the tragedy first-hand, which would suggest a need to research the Negative Information Bias and the psychology of rumour in future disaster recovery projects.

Type
Short papers
Information
South Pacific Journal of Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Community Development in North Australia , 1999 , pp. 81 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea and the Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory University, Australia 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amato, P. R., Ho, R., & Partridge, S. (1984). Responsibility, attribution, and helping behaviour in the Ash Wednesday bushfires. Australian Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C. (Ed.). (1981). The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behaviour. London: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Carr, S. C. (1996). Social psychology and the management of aid. In Carr, S. C., & Schumaker, J. F., Psychology and the developing world (pp. 103–118). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Coolican, H. (1990). Research methods and statistics in psychology. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
CSIRO Australia, Division of Atmospheric Research. (1998). Climate change under enhanced greenhouse conditions in Northern Australia. Aspendale, Victoria: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Darlin, D. (1985). Although U.S. cars are improved, imports still win quality survey. The Wall Street Journal, 12, 27.Google Scholar
Hewstone, M. (Ed.). (1983). Attribution theory: Social and functional extensions. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. (1989). Australian's Attitudes to overseas aid. International Development Issues, No 8. Canberra: Australian International Development Assistance Bureau, Australian Government Printing Service.Google Scholar
Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkup, M. (1997). Policy dysfunction in humanitarian organisations: The role of coping strategies, institutions, and organisational culture. Journal of Refugee Studies, 10, 37–60.10.1093/jrs/10.1.37CrossRefGoogle Scholar