Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:29:54.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linguistic factors in children's understanding of idioms*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Raymond W. Gibbs Jr*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
*
Program in Experimental Psychology, Clark Kerr Hall, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

Abstract

This study examined the effect of two linguistic factors on children's understanding of idioms. Kindergarten, first, third and fourth graders listened to idiomatic expressions either alone or at the end of short story contexts. Their task was to explain verbally the intended meanings of these idioms and then to choose the correct idiomatic interpretations of these phrases. The results showed that in the presence of supporting context younger children (kindergarten and first graders) understood idioms that were syntactically frozen (e.g. turn back the clock) better than they did idioms which can be seen in a variety of syntactic forms (e.g. lay down the law). Older children (third and fourth graders) comprehended both kinds of idiom equally well. Moreover, with context, children at all grade levels were better at explaining the figurative meanings of idioms whose literal and idiomatic interpretations were closely related (e.g. hold your tongues) than they were at explaining idioms whose literal and figurative meanings were not closely related (e.g. beat around the bush). Without context there were few significant differences noted in children's understanding of the different kinds of idiom. The significance of these findings for developmental models of idiom comprehension is discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by a Faculty Research Grant from the University of California, Santa Cruz. I wish to thank Ms Hanolore, her staff, and the students of the Gateway School of Santa Cruz, and Mr Nelson, his staff, and the students of the Branciforte Grammar School for their generous help and participation in the project. I also wish to thank J. J. Hamlyn and Jan Huntoon for their assistance in the data collection and analysts. Gayle Gonzales and Laura Thompson provided valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, B. (1982). On comprehending idioms: do children get the picture? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 33. 439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatner, M., Gates, J. & Makkai, A. (1975). A dictionary of American idioms. New York: Baron's Educational Series.Google Scholar
Fräser, B. (1970). Idioms within a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 6. 2242.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1974). Metaphors and modalities: how children project polar adjectives onto diverse domains. Child Development 45. 8491.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., Winner, E., Bechhofer, R. & Wolf, D. (1978). The development of figurative language. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language. Vol. 1. New York: Gardner.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1977). Children's performance on a spatial analogies task. Child Development 48. 1034–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory and Cognition 8. 449–56.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1985). On the process of understanding idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 14. 465–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1986). Skating on thin ice: literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse Processes 9. 1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. & Gonzales, G. (1985). Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms. Cognition 13. 243–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honeck, R., Sowry, B. & Voegtle, K. (1978). Proverbial understanding in a pictorial context. Child Development 49. 327–31.Google Scholar
Kittay, E. & Lehrer, A. (1981). Semantic fields and the structure of metaphor. Studies in language 5. 3163.Google Scholar
Lodge, D. & Leach, E. (1975). Children's acquisition of idioms in the English language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18. 521–9.Google Scholar
Mueller, R. & Gibbs, R. (1987). Processing idioms with multiple meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 16. 6381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollio, H., Barlow, J., Fine, H. & Pollio, H. (1977). Psychology and the poetics of growth. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Prinz, P. (1983). The development of idiomatic meaning in children. Language and Speech 26. 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, R. & Ortony, A. (1980). Some issues in the measurement of children's comprehension of metaphorical language. Child Development 51. 1110–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In Dornic, S. (ed.), Attention and Performance. Vol. v. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Strassler, J. (1982). Idioms in English. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Swinney, D. & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18. 523–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker, D. & Canter, G. (1981). Idiomatic versus literal interpretations of ditrophically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24. 64–9.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (1983). The emergence of the literal-metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. Child Development 54. 154–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. & Wilson, T. (1984). Sources of difficulty in the young child's understanding of metaphorical language. Child Development 55. 1588–606.Google Scholar
Winner, E. (1979). New names for old things: the emergence of metaphoric language. Journal of Child Language 6. 469–92.Google Scholar
Winner, E., Engel, M. & Gardner, H. (1980). Misunderstanding metaphor: what's the problem? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 30. 2232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed