Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T19:31:41.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deformations of Fell bundles and twisted graph algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2016

IAIN RAEBURN
IAIN RAEBURN*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. e-mail: iraeburn@maths.otago.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider Fell bundles over discrete groups, and the C*-algebra which is universal for representations of the bundle. We define deformations of Fell bundles, which are new Fell bundles with the same underlying Banach bundle but with the multiplication deformed by a two-cocycle on the group. Every graph algebra can be viewed as the C*-algebra of a Fell bundle, and there are many cocycles of interest with which to deform them. We thus obtain many of the twisted graph algebras of Kumjian, Pask and Sims. We demonstate the utility of our approach to these twisted graph algebras by proving that the deformations associated to different cocycles can be assembled as the fibres of a C*-bundle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 161 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 535 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Abrams, G. and Aranda Pino, G. The Leavitt path algebra of a graph. J. Algebra 293 (2005), 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Anderson, J. and Paschke, W. The rotation algebra. Houston J. Math. 15 (1989), 1–26.Google Scholar
[3] Aranda Pino, G., Clark, J., an Huef, A. and Raeburn, I. Kumjian–Pask algebras of higher-rank graphs. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 365 (2013), 3613–3641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Backhouse, N.B. Projective representations of space groups II. Factor systems. Quart. J. Math. 21 (1970), 277–295.Google Scholar
[5] Bédos, E. and Conti, R. Fourier series and twisted C*-crossed products. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 21 (2015), 32–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Bhowmick, J., Neshveyev, S. and Sangha, A. Deformation of operator algebras by Borel cocycles. J. Funct. Anal. 265 (2013), 983–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Brownlowe, N., Sims, A. and Vittadello, S.T. Co-universal C*-algebras associated to generalised graphs. Israel J. Math. 193 (2013), 399–440.Google Scholar
[8] Combes, F. Crossed products and Morita equivalence. Proc. London Math. Soc. 49 (1984), 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Davidson, K.R. and Yang, D. Periodicity in rank 2 graph algebras. Canad. J. Math. 61 (2009), 1239–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Deicke, K., Pask, D. and Raeburn, I. Coverings of directed graphs and crossed products of C*-algebras by coactions of homogeneous spaces. Internat. J. Math. 14 (2003), 773–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Echterhoff, S., Kaliszewski, S. and Quigg, J. Maximal coactions. Internat. J. Math. 15 (2004), 47–61.Google Scholar
[12] Echterhoff, S., Kaliszewski, S., Quigg, J. and Raeburn, I. A categorical approach to imprimitivity theorems for C*-dynamical systems. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 180 (2006), no. 850, viii+169.Google Scholar
[13] Exel, R. Amenability for Fell bundles. J. Reine Agnew. Math. 492 (1997), 41–73.Google Scholar
[14] Exel, R. and Laca, M. Partial dynamical systems and the KMS condition. Comm. Math. Phys. 232 (2003), 223–277.Google Scholar
[15] Fell, J.M.G. and Doran, R.S. Representations of *-Algebras, Locally Compact Groups, and Banach *-Algebraic Bundles. Pure and Appl. Math., vol. 125 and 126 (Academic Press, San Diego, 1988).Google Scholar
[16] Green, P. The local structure of twisted covariance algebras. Acta Math. 140 (1978), 191–250.Google Scholar
[17] Hazlewood, R., Raeburn, I., Sims, A. and Webster, S.B.G. Remarks on some fundamental results about higher-rank graphs and their C*-algebras. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 56 (2013), 575–597.Google Scholar
[18] Kalisezwski, S., Kumjian, A., Quigg, J. and Sims, A. Topological realizations and fundamental groups of higher-rank graphs. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 59 (2016), 143–168.Google Scholar
[19] Kalisezwski, S., Quigg, J. and Raeburn, I. Skew products and crossed products by coactions. J. Operator Theory 46 (2001), 411–433.Google Scholar
[20] Kleppner, A. Non type I multiplier representations of abelian groups. Technical Report (Dept. Math. Univ of Maryland, 1975), 75–8.Google Scholar
[21] Kumjian, A. and Pask, D. C*-algebras of directed graphs and group actions. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 19 (1999), 1503–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Kumjian, A. and Pask, D. Higher rank graph C*-algebras. New York J. Math. 6 (2000), 1–20.Google Scholar
[23] Kumjian, A., Pask, D. and Sims, A. Homology for higher-rank graphs and twisted C*-algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 263 (2012), 1539–1574.Google Scholar
[24] Kumjian, A., Pask, D. and Sims, A. On twisted higher-rank graph C*-algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 367 (2015), 5177–5216.Google Scholar
[25] Kumjian, A., Pask, D. and Sims, A. On the K-theory of twisted higher-rank-graph algebras. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 401 (2013), 104–113.Google Scholar
[26] Landstad, M.B., Phillips, J., Raeburn, I. and Sutherland, C.E. Representations of crossed products by coactions and principal bundles. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 299 (1987), 747–784.Google Scholar
[27] Moore, C.C. Extensions and low-dimensional cohomology theory of locally compact groups. II. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 113 (1964), 64–86.Google Scholar
[28] Packer, J.A. C*-algebras corresponding to projective representations of discrete Heisenberg groups. J. Operator Theory 18 (1987), 42–66.Google Scholar
[29] Packer, J.A. and Raeburn, I. On the structure of twisted group C*-algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 334 (1992), 685–718.Google Scholar
[30] Pask, D., Quigg, J. and Raeburn, I. Coverings of k-graphs. J. Algebra 289 (2005), 161–191.Google Scholar
[31] Pask, D., Raeburn, I., Rørdam, M. and Sims, A. Rank-two graphs whose C*-algebras are direct limits of circle algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 239 (2006), 137–178.Google Scholar
[32] Quigg, J.C. Full and reduced C*-coactions. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 116 (1994), 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33] Quigg, J.C. Discrete coactions and C*-algebraic bundles. J. Aust. Math. Soc. (Series A) 60 (1996), 204–221.Google Scholar
[34] Raeburn, I. Graph Algebras. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 103 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 2005).Google Scholar
[35] Raeburn, I. and Williams, D.P. Morita Equivalence and Continuous-Trace C*-Algebras. Math. Surveys and Monographs, vol. 60 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1998).Google Scholar
[36] Rieffel, M.A. Continuous fields of C*-algebras coming from group cocycles and actions. Math. Ann. 283 (1989), 631–643.Google Scholar
[37] Robertson, D.I. and Sims, A. Simplicity of C*-algebras associated to higher-rank graphs. Bull. London Math. Soc. 39 (2007), 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[38] Robertson, G. and Steger, T. Affine buildings, tiling systems and higher rank Cuntz–Krieger algebras. J. Reine Angew. Math. 513 (1999), 115–144.Google Scholar
[39] Slawny, J. On factor representations and the C*-algebras of canonical commutation relations. Comm. Math. Phys. 24 (1972), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[40] Williams, D.P. The structure of crossed products by smooth actions. J. Aust. Math. Soc. (Series A), 47 (1989), 226–235.Google Scholar
[41] Williams, D.P. Crossed Products of C*-Algebras. Math. Surveys and Monographs, vol. 134 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 2007).Google Scholar
[42] Yamashita, M. Deformation of algebras associated to group cocycles. Preprint; arXiv:1107.2512.Google Scholar
[43] Zeller-Meier, G. Produits croisés d'une C*-algèbre par un groupe d'automorphismes. J. Math. Pure Appl. 47 (1968), 101–239.Google Scholar
[44] Zygmund, A. Trigonometric Series (Cambridge University Press, 1959).Google Scholar