Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T13:42:44.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray grazing incidence technique—corrections in residual stress measurement—a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

S. Wroński ,
K. Wierzbanowski ,
A. Baczmański ,
A. Lodini ,
Ch. Braham  and
W. Seiler
S. Wroński
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Sciences, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
K. Wierzbanowski
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Sciences, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
A. Baczmański
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Sciences, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
A. Lodini
Affiliation:
LACM, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, 9, Bd. de la Paix, 51100 Reims, France
Ch. Braham
Affiliation:
LIM, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers, 151, Bd. de l’Hopital, 75013 Paris, France
W. Seiler
Affiliation:
LIM, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers, 151, Bd. de l’Hopital, 75013 Paris, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using X-ray grazing incidence diffraction (GID) it is possible to perform a nondestructive analysis of the heterogeneous stress field for different volumes below the surface of the sample. The stress can be measured at very small depths, of the order of a few μm. The penetration depth of radiation is almost constant in a wide 2θ range for a given incidence angle α. It can be easily changed by an appropriate selection of α angle (or also by using a different type of radiation). There are, however, some factors which have to be corrected in this technique. The most important is the refraction of X-ray wave: it changes the wavelength and direction of the beam. Both effects modify a pick position. A corresponding correction was calculated and tested on ferrite powder and on 316L austenite stainless steel sample.

Keywords

diffractiongrazing incidenceresidual stressesX-ray refraction
Type
Methods For Residual Stress Analysis
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 24 , Supplement S1 , June 2009 , pp. S11 - S15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baczmanski, A., Tidu, A., Lipinski, P., Humbert, M., and Wierzbanowski, K. (2006). “New type of diffraction elastic constants for stress determination,” Mater. Sci. ForumMSFOEP 524–525, 235–240.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.524-525.235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baczmański, A., Wierzbanowski, K., Lipiński, P., Helmholdt, R. B., Ekambaranathan, G., and Pathiraj, B. (1994). Philos. Mag. APMAADG 69, 437–449.10.1080/01418619408242223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, B. D. (1956). Elements of X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
Dölle, H. (1979). “The influence of multiaxial stress states, stress gradients and elastic anisotropy on the evaluation of (residual) stresses by X-rays,” J. Appl. Crystallogr.JACGAR 12, 489–501.10.1107/S0021889879013169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, T., Predecki, P. K., Zhu, X., Etaough, M., Goehner, R., and Lucernoni, R. (1997). “Measurement of the refraction correction for asymmetric grazing incidence XRD from rough surfaces and powders,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 39, 381–389.Google Scholar
Guinier, A. (1964). Theorie et Technique de la Radiocrystallographie (Dunod, Paris).Google Scholar
Hart, M., Parrish, W., Bellotto, M., and Lim, G. S. (1988). “The refractive-index correction in powder diffraction,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. 44, 193–197.10.1107/S010876738701050XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyan, I. C. and Cohen, J. B. (1987). Residual Stress—Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
Ott, M. H. and Löhe, D. (2003). “The influence of surface roughness on the refraction of X-rays and its effect on Bragg peak positions,” Adv. X-Ray Anal.AXRAAA 46, 232–237.Google Scholar
Parratt, L. G. (1954). “Surface studies of solids by total reflection of X-rays,” Phys. Rev.PRVAAH 95, 359–369.10.1103/PhysRev.95.359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrzypek, S. J. (2002). New Approach to Measuring Residual Macro-Stresses with the Application of the Grazing Angle X-Ray Diffraction Geometry Dissertations Monographies, No. 108 (AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland).Google Scholar
Skrzypek, S. J., Baczmański, A., Ratuszek, W., and Kusior, E. (2001). “New approach to stress analysis based on grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction,” J. Appl. Crystallogr.JACGAR 34, 427–435.10.1107/S0021889801005404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zattarin, P., Baczmanski, A., Lipinski, P., and Wierzbanowski, K. (2000). “Modified self-consistent model for time independent plasticity of polycrystalline material,” Arch. Metall.ARMEER 45, 163–184.Google Scholar