Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:43:30.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further evidence for the post-release survival of hand-reared, orphaned bats based on radio-tracking and ring-return data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A Kelly*
Affiliation:
RSPCA Wildlife Department, Wilberforce Way, Southwater, Horsham, West Sussex RH13 9RS, UK
S Goodwin
Affiliation:
RSPCA Stapeley Grange Wildlife Centre, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7JW, UK
A Grogan
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK
F Mathews
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: andkelly@rspca.org.uk

Abstract

We recently used radio-tracking to demonstrate short-term, post-release survival of five orphaned, hand-reared pipistrelle bats. Here, we present further evidence of short-term, post-release survival and also demonstrate longer term survival using re-sighting data of ringed common (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) and soprano (Pipistrellus pygmaeus) pipistrelle bats. Ten bats (five common and five soprano pipistrelles) were radio-tracked for between one and ten days. Three of these were retrieved after one, two and four days, respectively. In addition, five of the 39 (13%) ringed bats returned to their release boxes between 38 and 1,389 days after release, at least two of which survived over the winter in the wild. A sixth ringed bat was retrieved 27 days after release after becoming trapped in a house. We also identified potential barriers to successful rehabilitation. Two of the ten bats radio-tracked in the current project became trapped within buildings and another bat had to be retrieved following entanglement with debris. We therefore recommend that attention be paid to giving bats the opportunity, prior to release, in identifying and using small exit holes similar to those found in buildings and loft spaces. We also recommend allowing bats to self-release following prolonged pre-release flight training in a large flight cage situated in suitable bat habitat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kelly, A and Bland, M 2006 Admissions, diagnoses, and outcomes for Eurasian sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) brought to a wildlife rehabilitation centre in England. Journal of Raptor Research 40: 231235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A, Goodwin, S, Grogan, A and Mathews, F 2008 Postrelease survival of hand-reared pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus spp). Animal Welfare 17: 375382Google Scholar
Kelly, A, Halstead, C, Hunter, D, Leighton, K, Grogan, A and Harris, M 2011 Factors affecting the likelihood of release of injured and orphaned woodpigeons (Columba palumbus). Animal Welfare 20: 523534Google Scholar
Molony, SE, Baker, PJ, Garland, L, Cuthill, IC and Harris, S 2007 Factors that can be used to predict release rates for wildlife casualties. Animal Welfare 16: 361367Google Scholar
Serangeli, MT, Cistrone, L, Ancillotto, L, Tomassini, A and Russo, D 2012 The post-release fate of hand-reared orphaned bats: survival and habitat selection. Animal Welfare 21: 918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, B 1996 The post-release survival of oiled, cleaned seabirds in North America. Ibis 13: 222228Google Scholar
Swaisgood, RR 2010 The conservation-welfare nexus in reintroduction programmes: a role for sensory ecology. Animal Welfare 19: 125137Google Scholar
Walsh, ST and Stebbings, RE 1988 Care and Rehabilitation of Wild Bats. The Robert Stebbings Consultancy Ltd: Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UKGoogle Scholar