Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T23:01:07.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characteristics of antegrade-only accessory pathways in children and adolescents

Part of: Electrophysiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Minh B. Nguyen Open the ORCID record for Minh B. Nguyen [Opens in a new window] ,
Allison C. Hill ,
Yaniv Bar-Cohen  and
Michael J. Silka
Minh B. Nguyen*
Affiliation:
The Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Toronto, ON, Canada
Allison C. Hill
Affiliation:
The Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Yaniv Bar-Cohen
Affiliation:
The Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Michael J. Silka
Affiliation:
The Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Dr M. B. Nguyen, MD, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ONM5G 1X8, Canada. Tel: 416-813-5848; Fax: 416-813-5582. E-mail: minh.nguyen@sickkids.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is minimal data regarding antegrade-only accessory pathways in young patients. Given evolving recommendations and treatments, retrospective analysis of the clinical and electrophysiologic properties of antegrade-only pathways in patients <21 years old was performed, with subsequent comparison of electrophysiology properties to age-matched controls with bidirectional pathways. Of 522 consecutive young patients with ventricular pre-excitation referred for electrophysiology study, 33 (6.3%) had antegrade-only accessory pathways. Indications included palpitations (47%), chest pain (25%), and syncope (22%). The shortest value for either the accessory pathway effective refractory period or the pre-excited R-R interval was taken for each patient, with the median of the antegrade-only group significantly greater than shortest values for the bidirectional group (310 [280–360] ms versus 270 [240–302] ms, p < 0.001). However, the prevalence of pathways with high-risk properties (effective refractory period or shortest pre-excited R-R interval <250 ms) was similar in both study patients and controls (13% versus 21%) (p = 0.55). Sixteen patients had a single antegrade-only accessory pathway and no inducible arrhythmia. Six patients had Mahaim fibres, all right anterolateral with inducible antidromic reciprocating tachycardia. However, 11 patients with antegrade-only accessory pathways and 3 with Mahaim fibres had inducible tachycardia due to a second substrate recognised at electrophysiology study. These included concealed accessory pathways (7), bidirectional accessory pathways (5), and atrioventricular node re-entry (2). Antegrade-only accessory pathways require comprehensive electrophysiology evaluation as confounding factors such as high-risk conduction properties or inducible Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) due to a second substrate of tachycardia are often present.

Keywords

Paediatric cardiologyelectrophysiologyablationventricular pre-excitation
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 31 , Issue 8 , August 2021 , pp. 1258 - 1262
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tai, CT, Chen, SA, Chiang, CE, et al. Accessory atrioventricular pathways with only antegrade conduction in patients with symptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Clinical features, electrophysiological characteristics and response to radiofrequency catheter ablation. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 132–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammill, SC, Pritchett, EL, Klein, GJ, Smith, WM, Gallagher, JJ. Accessory atrioventricular pathways that conduct only in the antegrade direction. Circulation 1980; 62: 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, GJ, Gulamhusein, SS. Intermittent preexcitation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52: 292–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milstein, S, Sharma, AD, Klein, GJ. Electrophysiologic profile of asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 1097–1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), et al. PACES/HRS expert consensus statement on the management of the asymptomatic young patient with a Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW, ventricular preexcitation) electrocardiographic pattern: developed in partnership between the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of PACES, HRS, and the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), the American Heart Association (AHA), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS). Heart Rhythm 2012; 9: 1006–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etheridge, SP, Escudero, CA, Blaufox, AD, et al. Life-threatening event risk in children with Wolff-Parkinson-white syndrome: a multicenter international study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018; 4: 433–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, JJ, Smith, WM, Kasell, JH, Benson, DW, Sterba, R, Grant, AO. Role of Mahaim fibers in cardiac arrhythmias in man. Circulation 1981; 64: 176–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Mambro, C, Russo, MS, Righi, D, et al. Ventricular pre-excitation: symptomatic and asymptomatic children have the same potential risk of sudden cardiac death. Europace 2015; 17: 617–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubuš, P, Vít, P, Gebauer, RA, Materna, O, Janoušek, J. Electrophysiologic profile and results of invasive risk stratification in asymptomatic children and adolescents with the Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiographic pattern. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014; 7: 218–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zachariah, JP, Walsh, EP, Triedman, JK, et al. Multiple accessory pathways in the young: the impact of structural heart disease. Am Heart J 2013; 165: 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCanta, AC, Collins, KK, Schaffer, MS. Incidental dual atrioventricular nodal physiology in children and adolescents: clinical follow-up and implications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010; 33: 1528–1532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chubb, H, Campbell, RM, Motonaga, KS, Ceresnak, SR, Dubin, AM. Management of asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-white pattern by pediatric electrophysiologists. J Pediatr 2019; 213: 88–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raposo, D, António, N, Andrade, H, Sousa, P, Pires, A, Gonçalves, L. Management of asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-white pattern in young patients: has anything changed? Pediatr Cardiol 2019; 40: 892–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helm, RH, Varkey, SC, Karnik, AA. Differential effective refractory period as a useful marker of multiple accessory pathways. J Arrhythm 2019; 35: 296–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, JP, Kannankeril, PJ, Fish, FA. Isoproterenol administration during general anesthesia for the evaluation of children with ventricular preexcitation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011; 4: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed