For a summary, see the Editors’ Introduction in this special issue: Ganesh, C., Schmeltz, M., and Smith, J., “Introduction: Climate Change and the Legal, Ethical and Health Issues Facing Healthcare and Public Health Systems,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 48, no. 4 (2020): 636–642.Google Scholar

Jamieson, D., Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle against Climate Change Failed — and What It Means for Our Future (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014): at 4.Google Scholar

Nick Watts celebrated the greater tangibility of reframing climate change as human health issue and its connection to advancing the mitigation agenda in Humphreys, G., “Reframing Climate Change as a Health Issue,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 92, no. 8 (2014): 551–552.Google Scholar

Malbach, E. W., Nisbet, M., and Baldwin, P. et al., “Reframing Climate Change as a Public Health Issue: An Exploratory Study of Public Reactions,” BMC Public Health 10, no. 1 (2010): 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. Jr., “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis,” Science 155, no. 3767 (1967): 1203–1207.Google Scholar

Jones, W. H. S., ed., Hippocrates Collected Works, vol. I (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1868): at 320, available at <www.perseus.tufts.edu> (last visited September 24, 2020).Google Scholar

Faden, R., Bernstein, J., and Shebaya, S., “Public Health Ethics,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/publichealth-ethics/> (last visited September 24, 2020).+(last+visited+September+24,+2020).>Google Scholar

There are noteworthy exceptions to the above characterization of public health ethics. Recently, some voices in public health have called our attention to the public health consequences of environmental harms. When concern for the environment is purely motivated by its importance public health and human welfare, public health ethics continues its anthropocentric streak. But some writers appear to be moving beyond the anthropocentrism that has long dominated public health ethics: Lee, L. M., “A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics,” The American Journal of Bioethics 17, no. 9 (2017): 5–12; Degeling, C., Lederman, Z., and Rock, M., “Culling and the Common Good: Re-evaluating Harms and Benefits under the One Health Paradigm,” Public Health Ethics 9, no. 3 (2016): 244–254; Persad, G., “Justice and Public Health,” in Oxford Handbook of Public Health Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019); Verweij, M. and Bovenkerk, B., “Ethical Promises and Pitfalls on OneHealth,” Public Health Ethics 9, no. 1 (2016): 1–4.Google Scholar

Grady, C., “Institutional Review Boards: Purpose and Challenges,” Chest 48, no. 5 (2015): 1148–1155.Google Scholar

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, April 18, 1979, available at <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report> (last visited September 24, 2020); 45 C.F.R. § 46.111 (2018); 21 C.F.R. § 56.111 (2019).+(last+visited+September+24,+2020);+45+C.F.R.+§+46.111+(2018);+21+C.F.R.+§+56.111+(2019).>Google Scholar

Russell, W. M. S. and Burch, R. L., The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique (London: Methuen, 1959).Google Scholar

Singer, P., Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals (New York: The New York Review, 1975).Google Scholar

Regan, T., The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Steinbock, B., “Speciesism and the Idea of Equality,” Philosophy 53, no. 204 (1978): 247–256.Google Scholar

DeGrazia, D. and Beauchamp, T. L., Principles of Animal Research Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google ScholarPubMed

Korsgaard, C. M., Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

DeGrazia, D.. “Moral Status as a Matter of Degree?” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 46, no. 2 (2008): 181–198.Google Scholar

Williams, B., “Must a Concern for the Environment Be Centered on Human Beings?” in Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 233–240. Originally published in 1992. Reprinted in Gruen, L., Jamieson, D., and Schlottman, C., eds., Reflecting on Nature: Readings in Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013): at 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Williams, supra note 18: at 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pew Research Center, The Politics of Climate, October 4, 2016, available at <https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2016/10/PS_2016.10.04_Politics-of-Climate_FINAL.pdf> (last visited September 1, 2020).+(last+visited+September+1,+2020).>Google Scholar

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2019).Google Scholar

National Research Council, Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Rom, W. N. and Pinkerton, K. E., “Introduction: Consequences of Global Warming to the Public’s Health,” in Global Climate Change and Public Health, ed. Pinkerton, K. E. and Rom, W. N. (New York: Human Press, 2014), 1–20: at 9–15.Google Scholar

Adelman, S., “Geoengineering: Rights, Risks and Ethics,” Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 8, no. 1 (2017): 119–138; Corner, A. and Pidgeon, N., “Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications,” Environment 52, no. 1 (2010): 24–37; Elliott, K., “Geoengineering and the Precautionary Principle,” International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24, no. 2 (2010): 237–253; Jamieson, D., “Ethics and Intentional Climate Change,” Climatic Change 33, no. 3 (1996): 323–336; Royal Society, Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance, and Uncertainty (London: Royal Society, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Adelman, supra note 24; see Corner and Pidgeon, supra note 24; see Jamieson, supra note 24.Google Scholar

Gardiner, S. M., “Why Geoengineering Is Not a ‘Global Public Good’, and Why It Is Ethically Misleading to Frame It as One,” Climatic Change 121, no. 3 (2013): 513–525; McLaren, D. P., “Whose Climate and Whose Ethics? Conceptions of Justice in Solar Engineering Modeling,” Energy Research and Social Science 44 (2018): 209–221; Preston, C. J., ed., Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Atmospheric Anthropocene (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016).Google Scholar

See Adelman, supra note 24; Callies, D. E., “Institutional Legitimacy and Geoengineering Governance,” Ethics, Policy & Environment 21, no. 3 (2018): 324–340; Lawford-Smith, H., “Democratic Authority to Geoengineer,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23, no. 5 (2020): 600–617.Google Scholar

See Adelman, supra note 24; see Jamieson, supra note 24.Google Scholar

Stilgoe, J., “Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation,” Science and Engineering Ethics 22, no. 3 (2015): 851–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, C. J., “Ethics and Geoengineering: Reviewing the Moral Issues Raised by Solar Radiation Management and Carbon Dioxide Removal,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews — Climate Change 4, no. 1 (2013): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

One of the earliest and most important contributions is Jamieson, supra note 24. For more recent discussions, see Bunzl, M., “Researching Geoengineering: Should Not or Could Not?” Environmental Research Letters 4, no. 3 (2009): 045104; Hourdequin, M., “Climate Change, Climate Engineering, and the ‘Global Poor’: What Does Justice Require?” Ethics, Policy & Environment 21, no. 3 (2018): 270–288; Jinnah, S., Nicholson, S., and Flegal, J., “Toward Legitimate Governance of Solar Geoengineering Research: A Role for Sub-State Actors,” Ethics, Policy & Environment 21, no. 3 (2018): 362–381; and Morrow, D. R., Kopp, R. E., and Oppenheimer, M., “Toward Ethical Norms and Institutions for Climate Engineering Research,” Environmental Research Letters 4, no. 4 (2009): 045106. This list is not exhaustive, but just a sample of the literature on geoengineering research ethics.Google Scholar

See Morrow, Kopp, and Oppenheimer, supra note 31: at 2.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

See National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, supra note 10.Google Scholar

See Russell and Burch, supra note 11.Google Scholar

See Morrow, Kopp, and Oppenheimer, supra note 31: at 4.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

Friesen, P., Kearns, L., Redman, B., and Caplan, A. L., “Rethinking the Belmont Report?” The American Journal of Bioethics 17, no. 7 (2017): 15–21.Google Scholar

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the Internet: Strategies for Climate Change Adaptation, Climate Change Adaptation Resource Center (ARC-X), available at <https://www.epa.gov/arc-x/strategies-climate-change-adaptation> (last visited September 23, 2020).+(last+visited+September+23,+2020).>Google Scholar

See Rom and Pinkerton, supra note 23: at 12.Google Scholar

Leftwich, P. T., Edgington, M. P., and Harvey-Samuel, T. et al., “Recent Advances in Threshold-Dependent Gene Drives for Mosquitoes,” Biochemical Society Transactions 46, no. 5 (2018): 1203–1212.Google Scholar

Scudellari, M., “Self-Destructing Mosquitoes and Sterilized Rodents: The Promise of Gene Drives,” Nature 571, no 7764 (2019): 160–162.Google Scholar

Swart, R., Biesbroek, R., and Lourenço, T. Capela, “Science of Adaptation to Climate Change and Science for Adaptation,” Frontiers in Environmental Science 2 (2014): 1–29.Google Scholar

Lacey, J., Howden, S. M., Cvitanovic, C., and Dowd, A.-M.. “Informed Adaptation: Ethical Considerations for Adaptation Researchers and Decision-Makers.” Global Environmental Change 32 (2015): 200–210.Google Scholar

S, A. M.. Shelton, , Long, S. J., and Walker, A.S. et al., “First Field Release of a Genetically Engineered, Self-Limiting Agricultural Pest Insect: Evaluating Its Potential for Future Crop Protection,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 7 (2020), article 482.Google Scholar

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the Internet: “EPA Approves Experimental Use Permit to Test Innovative Biopesticide Tool to Better Protect Public Health,” Office of Pesticide Programs Update, available at <https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAEPAOPPT/bulletins/2896a76> (last visited September 24, 2020).+(last+visited+September+24,+2020).>Google Scholar

Emerson, C., James, S., Littler, K., and Randazzo, F. F., “Principles for Gene Drive Research,” Science 358, no. 6367 (2017): 1135–1136; Lavery, J. V., Harrington, L. C., and Scott, T. W., “Ethical, Legal, and Cultural Considerations for Site Selection for Research with Genetically Modified Mosquitoes,” American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 79, no. 3 (2008): 312–318; Macer, D., “Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues of Genetically Modifying Insect Vectors for Public Health,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 35, no. 7 (2005): 649–660; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016); Neuhaus, C. P. and Caplan, A. L., “Ethical Lessons from a Tale of Two Genetically Modified Insects,” Nature Biotechnology 35, no. 8 (2017): 713–716.Google Scholar

Meghani, Z., “Autonomy of Nations and Indigenous Peoples and the Environmental Release of Genetically Engineered Animals with Gene Drives,” Global Policy 10, no. 4 (2019): 554–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See Emerson et al., supra note 47; see Laverly et al., supra note 47; see Macer, supra note 47; Meghani, Z. and Boëte, C., “Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes, Zika and Other Arboviruses, Community Engagement, Costs, and Patents: Ethical Issues,” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 12, no. 7 (2018): e0006501; Neuhaus, C. P., “Community Engagement and Field Trials of Genetically Modified Insects and Animals,” Hastings Center Report 48, no. 1 (2018): 25–36; Resnik, D. B., Open Peer Commentary, “Field Trials of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes and Public Health Ethics,” The American Journal of Bioethics 17, no. 9 (2017): 24–26; Resnik, D. B., “Ethics of Community Engagement in Field Trials of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes,” Developing World Bioethics 18, no. 2 (2018): 135–143.Google Scholar

See Meghani and Boëte, supra note 49.Google Scholar

Meghani, Z. and Kuzma, J., “Regulating Animals with Gene Drive Systems: Lessons from the Regulatory Assessment of a Genetically Engineered Mosquito,” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5, suppl. 1 (2018): S203–S222.Google Scholar

See Laverly et al., supra note 47.Google Scholar

See Adelman, supra note 24; see Jamieson, supra note 24.Google Scholar

See Meghani and Kuzma, supra note 51.Google Scholar

See Neuhaus and Caplan, supra note 47.Google Scholar

See National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, supra note 47. Cited in Neuhaus and Caplan, supra note 47.Google Scholar

Id.Google Scholar

See Emerson et al., supra note 47, at 1136.Google Scholar

See National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, supra note 47, at 69.Google Scholar

Id., at 23.Google Scholar

Id. at 65.Google Scholar

See Singer, supra note 12.Google Scholar

See Regan, supra note 13.Google Scholar

For a valuable discussion of these alternatives, see Jamieson, D., Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008): chapter 6.Google Scholar

Goodpaster, K., “On Being Morally Considerable,” Journal of Philosophy 76, no. 6 (1978): 308–325; Taylor, P. W., Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986), excerpts reprinted in Gruen, L., Jamieson, D., and Schlottman, C., eds., Reflecting on Nature: Readings in Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013): 72–81.Google Scholar

Callicott, J. B., Beyond the Land Ethic (Albany: SUNY Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Leopold, A., A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There (New York: Oxford University Press, 1949).Google Scholar

See Taylor, supra note 65, at 73.Google Scholar

Id., at 74.Google Scholar

Id., at 76.Google Scholar

Id., at 78.Google Scholar

Lee, L. M., “A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics,” The American Journal of Bioethics 17, no. 9 (2017): 5–12.Google Scholar

Jamieson, D. on the Internet: “It’s Time to Rediscover Bioethics,” Fifteeneightyfour: Academic Perspectives from Cambridge University Press, available at <http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2020/05/its-time-to-rediscover-bioethics/> (last visited September 24, 2020).+(last+visited+September+24,+2020).>Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. C., Smith, E., and Rieder, T. N., “Does Health Promotion Harm the Environment?” The New Bioethics 26, no. 2 (2020): 158–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar