Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-6txkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-23T20:20:15.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic correlations among body condition score, somatic cell score, milk production, fertility and conformation traits in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

H. N. Kadarmideen
H. N. Kadarmideen*
Affiliation:
Statistical Animal Genetics Group, Institute of Animal Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zentrum, Zurich CH 8092, Switzerland
*
† E-mail: haja.kadarmideen@inw.agrl.ethz.ch
Get access

Abstract

Genetic and phenotypic parameters for body condition score (BCS), days to first service (DFS), non-return rate (NRR), somatic cell score (SCS), and 305-day milk, fat and protein yields were estimated, using 38930 multiple lactation records of cows across 1830 herds. The cows were daughters of '243 different sires. Single- and multi-trait repeatability animal models were used to estimate parameters based on restricted maximum likelihood methodology. Fixed effects in the model varied depending on the individual trait. Further, genetic relationships between 27 (linear and descriptive) type traits and functional traits (fertility and SCS) were estimated by regressing daughter type records on their sire's estimated breeding values for functional traits, using the same data set. Estimated regression coefficients were then subsequently used to derive approximate genetic correlations between type and functional traits (DFS, NRR and SCS). Body condition score had a moderate heritability (h2) of 0-26 and fertility traits had a low h2 (0-12 for DFS and 0-06 for NRR). Heritability of SCS and milk production traits was 0-14 and around 0-30, respectively. Ratio of permanent environmental variance to phenotypic variance was higher than h2 for all traits considered and ranged from 0-09 for NRR to 0-45 for milk yield. Body condition score had a favourable genetic correlation (rg) with SCS, but it was not strong (-0-08). Milk production was genetically antagonistic with fertility (rg: range 0-12 to 0-27 with DFS and -0-12 to -0-24 with NRR), with BCS (-0-39 to -0-50), and with SCS (0-10 to 0-15) showing that selecting for milk production alone would lead to decline in genetic merit for these functional traits. Body condition score had favourable genetic correlations with fertility traits (-0-35 with DFS and 0-04 with NRR) suggesting that BCS could be considered in a fertility index. Several type traits (especially 'udder' traits) had a favourable genetic relationship with fertility traits and SCS whereas dairy character had an unfavourable genetic relationship. Results of this study on genetic and phenotypic correlations among several functional, type and production traits could be used to design improved selection indexes for dairy producers.

Keywords

body condition scoredairy cowsgenetic correlationhealthreproduction

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , October 2004 , pp. 191 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berry, D. P., Buckley, E., Dillion, P., Evans, R. D., Rath, M. and Veerkamp, R. F. 2002. Genetic parameters of body condition score and body weight in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85: 2030–2039.Google Scholar
Berry, D. P., Buckley, E., Dillion, P., Evans, R. D., Rath, M. and Veerkamp, R. F. 2003. Genetic parameters for body condition score, body weight, milk yield, and fertility estimated using random regression models. Journal of Dairy Science 86:3704–3717.Google Scholar
Boichard, D. and Manfredi, E. 1994. Geneitc analysis of conception rate in French Holstein dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A 44:138–145.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. P., Emmans, G. C. and Brotherstone, S. 2001. Genetic evaluation of dairy bulls for energy balance traits using random regression. Animal Science 73:29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J. and Thompson, R. 2003. ASREML reference manual. New South Wales Agriculture, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Groen, A. F., Solkner, J., Aumann, J., Ducroq, V., Gengler, N. and Strandberg, E. 1997. EU Concerted Action ‘Genetic Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle‘(GIFT) annual report 1997. (http://www.boku.ac.at/nuwi/gift/report.doc)Google Scholar
Haile-Mariam, M., Morton, J. M. and Goddard, M. E. 2003. Estimates of genetic parameters for fertility traits of Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle. Animal Science 76:35–42.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. 1984. Applications of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
Heuer, C., Schukken, Y. H. and Dobbelaar, P. 1999. Postpartum body condition score and results from the first test day milk as predictors of disease, fertility, yield, and culling in commercial dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 295–304.Google Scholar
Kadarmideen, H. N. 2003. Recording disease and reproductive events in dairy cattle for developing national health and fertility selection indices. Proceedings of 33rd biennial session of ICAR. EAAP publication no. 107, pp. 157–161.Google Scholar
Kadarmideen, H. N. and Coffey, M. P. 2001. Quality and validation of insemination data for national genetic evaluations for dairy cow fertility in the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the INTERBULL meeting, Budapest, Hungary, August 2001. INTERBULL Bulletin vol. 27, pp. 133–138.Google Scholar
Kadarmideen, H. N. and Pryce, J. E. 2001. Genetic and economic relationships between somatic cell count and clinical mastitis and their use in selection for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle. Animal Science 73:19–28.Google Scholar
Kadarmideen, H. N., Thompson, R., Coffey, M. P. and Kossaibati, M. A. 2003. Genetic parameters and evaluations from single- and multiple- trait analysis of dairy cow fertility and milk production. Livestock Production Science 81: 183–195.Google Scholar
Kadarmideen, H. N., Thompson, R. and Simm, G. 2000. Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle. Animal Science 71: 411–419.Google Scholar
Kadarmideen, H. N. and Wegmann, S. 2003. Genetic parameters for body condition score and its relationship with type and production traits in Swiss Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 3685–3693.Google Scholar
Lassen, J., Hansen, M., Sorensen, M. K., Aamand, G. P., Christensen, L. G. and Madsen, P. 2003. Genetic relationship between body condition score, dairy character, mastitis, and diseases other than mastitis in first-parity Danish Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 3730–3735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mrode, R. A. and Swanson, G. J. T. 1996. Genetic and statistical properties of somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect means of reducing the incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 64: 847–856.Google Scholar
dairy breeds in the United Kingdom. Animal Science 66: 569–576.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Coffey, M. P. and Simm, G. 2001. The relationship between body condition score and reproductive performance. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 1508–1515.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Veerkamp, R. E., Thompson, R., Hill, W. G. and Simm, G. 1997. Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Science 65:353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal, M. D., Pryce, J. E., Woolliams, J. A. and Flint, A. P. F. 2002. The genetic relationship between commencement of luteal activity and calving interval, body condition score, production, and linear type traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 85: 3071–3080.Google Scholar
Rupp, R. and Boichard, D. 1999. Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, production, udder type traits, and milking ease in first lactation Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 2198–2204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veerkamp, R. E., Koenen, E. P. C. and Jong, G. de. 2001. Genetic correlations among body condition score, yield, and fertility in first-parity cows estimated by random regression models. Journal of Dairy Science 84:2327–2335.Google Scholar
Wall, E., Brotherstone, S., Woolliams, J. A., Banos, G. and Coffey, M. P. 2003. Genetic evaluation of fertility using direct and correlated traits. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 4093–4102.Google Scholar
Weller, J. I. and Ezra, E. 1997. Genetic analysis of somatic cell score and female fertility of Israeli Holsteins with an individual animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 586–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wildmann, E. E., Jones, G. M., Wagener, P. E., Boman, R. L., TrouttH. , F. Jr and Lesch, T. N. 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrode, R. A., Swanson, G. J. T. and Winters, M. S. 1998. Genetic parameters and evaluations for somatic cell counts and its relationship with production and type traits in some dairy breeds in the United Kingdom. Animal Science 66: 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Coffey, M. P. and Simm, G. 2001. The relationship between body condition score and reproductive performance. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 1508–1515.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Veerkamp, R. E., Thompson, R., Hill, W. G. and Simm, G. 1997. Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Science 65:353–360.Google Scholar
Royal, M. D., Pryce, J. E., Woolliams, J. A. and Flint, A. P. F. 2002. The genetic relationship between commencement of luteal activity and calving interval, body condition score, production, and linear type traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 85: 3071–3080.Google Scholar
Rupp, R. and Boichard, D. 1999. Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, production, udder type traits, and milking ease in first lactation Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 2198–2204.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. E., Koenen, E. P. C. and Jong, G. de. 2001. Genetic correlations among body condition score, yield, and fertility in first-parity cows estimated by random regression models. Journal of Dairy Science 84:2327–2335.Google Scholar
Wall, E., Brotherstone, S., Woolliams, J. A., Banos, G. and Coffey, M. P. 2003. Genetic evaluation of fertility using direct and correlated traits. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 4093–4102.Google Scholar
Weller, J. I. and Ezra, E. 1997. Genetic analysis of somatic cell score and female fertility of Israeli Holsteins with an individual animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 586–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wildmann, E. E., Jones, G. M., Wagener, P. E., Boman, R. L., Troutt, H. F. Jr and Lesch, T. N. 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 495–501.Google Scholar