Abstract
Polyepoxides are becoming a preferred alternative to heavier materials in structural applications, functioning as bonding agents and matrices for high-performance composites. The durability of polyepoxy-inorganic substrate interfaces depends on surface treatments (physical and chemical) and environmental curing conditions such as temperature, humidity, and mechanical stress. Detecting real-time changes at these interfaces is crucial to prevent failures. This study used a Surface Forces Apparatus (SFA) with multiple beam interferometry to investigate interface degradation during curing and aging. A stoichiometric mixture of bisphenol-A diglycidyl ether (BADGE) and amine-terminated polyoxypropylene glycol (JeffAmine D-230) was confined between smooth alumina substrates under varying humidity. The SFA and fringes of equal chromatic order (FECO) technique enabled real-time imaging and refractive index measurements of the confined polyepoxy. Curing strains and stresses were monitored over 48 hours. Key findings include: (1) low tensile forces promote complete curing across different humidity levels, dominated by molecular interactions; (2) high tensile forces prevent full curing unless compressive forces are applied; (3) high humidity rapidly induces water diffusion, increasing plasticization and preventing cure. Additional micro-tensile tests and failure analysis imaging revealed primarily cohesive (polymer-polymer) rather than adhesive (polymer-substrate) failure modes. This study introduces a novel method for assessing interface quality in polyepoxy-inorganic substrate systems, which has implications for various technological applications requiring durable bonding and adhesion performance.
Supplementary materials
Title
Supporting Information Monitoring Confined Inorganic-Polyepoxy-Inorganic Adhesive Interfacial Changes during Curing at Various Environmental Conditions
Description
S1.1 Surface configurations, nanofabrication, and FECO performance
Figure S1. Comparison of Al surfaces before and after exposure to 100% relative humidity.
Figure S2. Surface configurations showing fringes of equal chromatic order (FECO)
Figure S3: Schematic representation of the fabrication steps of the water-oxidized Al surfaces S1.2 Surface chemical analysis
Figure S4: XPS analysis of IBD alumina surfaces
Figure S5: XPS analysis of Al samples initially and after exposure to DI water
Figure S6: High-resolution XPS analysis of the Al2p region for aluminum surfaces
Figure S7: High-resolution XPS analysis of the O1s peak for aluminum surfaces
1.3
Film surface roughness and refractive index analysis
Figure S8: AFM micrographs and height profile Figure S9: Refractive indices of aluminum and alumina surfaces
Figure S10: 3D mapping of intensity variation along a FECO fringe
Figure S11: Cure strain as a function of time for BADGE/JeffAmine on the alumino-silicate mineral surface mica.
Actions



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)