Large-scale experimental validation of thermochemical water-splitting oxides discovered by defect graph neural networks

24 July 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Thermochemical water-splitting (TCH) based on 2-step thermal redox cycles in metal oxides is a promising approach to generating H2, but state-of-the-art (SOTA) CeO2 has several practical limitations, which has motivated continued materials discovery efforts in this field. Here, we improve upon a SOTA defect graph neural network (dGNN) surrogate model's oxygen vacancy predictions and combine them with Materials Project phase diagrams to down-select and discover structurally diverse, experimentally known metal oxides whose TCH performance was previously unknown. Amongst twelve candidates selected based on our high-throughput screening and down-selection criteria, we achieved ~80% accuracy in identifying materials with stable redox cycling and hydrogen production in stagnation flow reactor water-splitting experiments. Closer to 100% accuracy can be achieved if higher-accuracy, hybrid DFT-predicted vacancy formation energies were computed and used in lieu of the most uncertain dGNN-based screening predictions, as they correct false positives to true negatives. Notably, two discovered candidates, Sr3PrMn2O6 and Ba2Fe2O5, display hydrogen yields greater than CeO2 under specific redox conditions. These results demonstrate our ability to computationally predict and experimentally validate promising candidate TCH materials that have the potential to compete with CeO2.

Keywords

Graph neural networks
Density Functional Theory
Metal oxides
Hydrogen production
High-throughput screening

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
Supplementary information containing additional details in support of the main manuscript.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.