Impacts of Quinone Structure on Trade-Offs Between Redox Potential and CO2 Binding Strength

25 November 2025, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Quinones are well-studied and promising candidates for redox-active sorbents in electrochemical CO2 capture and storage (ECCS). Unfortunately a persisting issue in this use of quinones is their dianions’ known reactivity with O2. While attempts have been made to tune the redox-potentials of quinones to avoid this, quinones which are more tolerant to the presence of O2, are also generally less reactive towards CO2, i.e. there is an inherent trade-off. Building off of prior work on anthraquinones and fluorinated benzoquinones [Bui et al., J.Phys.Chem.C., 126, 14163-14172, 2022], this study investigates how the trade-off varies for a wider range of quinone types. No single unifying trade-off is found; instead distinct quinone families follow distinct trade-offs. A Hückel model is utilised to demonstrate how the change in aromaticity upon two-electron reduction strongly influences the redox-potential, and that given the same change in aromaticity, ortho-quinones will possess a significantly more positive redox potential than non-ortho- quinones. By varying the carbonyl placement in otherwise unfunctionalised quinones, the redox-potential may be tuned by a range of up to 0.8 V. One previously uninvestigated quinone for ECCS, 2,3-naphthoquinone, is identified as particularly promising, and NMR spectroscopy shows its dianion capable of capturing CO2 but lacks electrochemical reversibility.

Keywords

CO2 Capture
ECCS
Quinones

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
Supplementary information to "Impacts of Quinone Structure on Trade-Off Between Redox Potential and CO2 Binding Strength"
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.