Abstract
Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLPs) are promising for accelerating simulation of ion transport in all-solid-state battery materials, but their accuracy across diverse material compositions and symmetries remains unquantified. Here, we systematically benchmark six state-of-the-art MLPs, namely CHGNet, EquiformerV2 in two training variants, MatterSim, SevenNet, and MACE, on representative Li- and Na-based superionic conductors. By comparing predicted atomic forces, diffusion coefficients from MLP-driven molecular dynamics simulations, and second- and third-order interatomic force constants (IFCs) against density functional theory (DFT) and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD), we assess the fidelity of each model across these properties. EquiformerV2 models, especially the variant trained only on the OMAT dataset, exhibit the lowest force prediction errors and yield diffusion coefficients in closest agreement with AIMD. Consistently, MLPs with more accurate force predictions produce more reliable diffusion metrics. However, while second-order IFCs are reasonably captured, all models struggle to reproduce third-order (anharmonic) IFCs, highlighting significant challenges in modeling anharmonic lattice dynamics with cur- rent MLPs. This benchmark study highlights the importance of accurately capturing atomic forces in reasonably producing ion transport properties in all-solid-state battery materials and provides guidance for future improvement of MLPs.
Supplementary materials
Title
Supplementary Information: Probing Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials On Ion Transport Properties
Description
The supplementary information includes detailed comparisons of the interatomic forces, diffusion coefficient, as well as second- and third-order IFCs of all the MLPs evaluated against DFT/AIMD across all Na-based systems. It also contains individual MLP–DFT comparison plots for both second- and third-order IFCs, along with additional figures referenced in the main text.
Actions



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)