Probing Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials On Ion Transport Properties

12 December 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLPs) are promising for accelerating simulation of ion transport in all-solid-state battery materials, but their accuracy across diverse material compositions and symmetries remains unquantified. Here, we systematically benchmark six state-of-the-art MLPs, namely CHGNet, EquiformerV2 in two training variants, MatterSim, SevenNet, and MACE, on representative Li- and Na-based superionic conductors. By comparing predicted atomic forces, diffusion coefficients from MLP-driven molecular dynamics simulations, and second- and third-order interatomic force constants (IFCs) against density functional theory (DFT) and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD), we assess the fidelity of each model across these properties. EquiformerV2 models, especially the variant trained only on the OMAT dataset, exhibit the lowest force prediction errors and yield diffusion coefficients in closest agreement with AIMD. Consistently, MLPs with more accurate force predictions produce more reliable diffusion metrics. However, while second-order IFCs are reasonably captured, all models struggle to reproduce third-order (anharmonic) IFCs, highlighting significant challenges in modeling anharmonic lattice dynamics with cur- rent MLPs. This benchmark study highlights the importance of accurately capturing atomic forces in reasonably producing ion transport properties in all-solid-state battery materials and provides guidance for future improvement of MLPs.

Keywords

Ionic Transport
Force-field fidelity in ion conductors
Diffusion Coefficients (DC)
Machine Learning Interatomic Potential

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information: Probing Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials On Ion Transport Properties
Description
The supplementary information includes detailed comparisons of the interatomic forces, diffusion coefficient, as well as second- and third-order IFCs of all the MLPs evaluated against DFT/AIMD across all Na-based systems. It also contains individual MLP–DFT comparison plots for both second- and third-order IFCs, along with additional figures referenced in the main text.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.