Abstract
Porous biopolymer platforms integrated with metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) pair the processability of
polymer networks with the high surface area and tunable chemistry of MOFs, but reported performance is
often difficult to compare across studies due to inconsistent metrics, idealized batch testing, and limited
attention to transport, regeneration, and matrix effects. This review evaluates porous biopolymer–MOF
composites from a platform-level perspective, emphasizing how architecture, MOF placement, and
operating mode shape performance under realistic constraints rather than isolated adsorption capacities.
Performance trends are synthesized across major contaminant classes (heavy metals, dyes, pharmaceuticals,
and PFAS), focusing on dominant interaction mechanisms and the penalties imposed by diffusion
limitations, fouling, and competitive solutes. Regeneration and durability are treated as central determinants
of viability, alongside leaching risk and water-matrix realism. To improve comparability and translation, a
minimum reporting framework is proposed, specifying essential parameters for both batch and flow
systems. Overall, the review provides a structured basis to judge when porous biopolymer–MOF
composites justify added complexity for sustainable water treatment.



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)