Systems of Innovation and Economic Theory

10 May 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

The volume of literature which emerged around innovation and systems of innovation in the 1980s and the first half of the 1990s held the promise of the emergence of an account of the general economy which could challenge the mainstream. The central argument of this paper is that the failure of that promise to materialise was due to the identification of neoclassical economics as the mainstream against which the system of innovation approach would be counterpoised, rather than neoliberal economics. While the former constitutes the disciplinary base of mainstream economics, the latter has formed its discourse. This paper looks at the contradictions between discipline and discourse in the mainstream and the relegation of the economic understanding of innovation to a peripheral area of study within economics.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.