THE INTRODUCTION OF RELIGION TO POLITICS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND THE AFTERMATH: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF THE HISTORY OF PRE AND POST BANGLADESH ERAS

14 May 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Drawing from historical narratives of pre and post Bangladesh eras, the article shows how colonial rule, political parties and military rulers used religion and religious identity in public affairs, the constitution and politics, which eventually caused grave social disorder in the Undivided India and later independent Bangladesh. This article has two key arguments; firstly, political recognition of a religion(s) or preferential treatment of any religious group has never had a positive impact upon the countries Indian sub-continent (which includes Bangladesh). Secondly, based on the streamline of the first argument, the article further argues that since the preferential treatment of religion has repeatedly given rise to negative consequences, it is highly probable that declaring Islam as the state religion under the state religion clause is not advisable in the context of the secular constitutional framework and likewise, will work against, rather than encouraging, religious harmony.

Keywords

religion and politics
Bangladesh
secularism
Bengal's Historical narratives

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.