“The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics”: A Universal Language of Contact?

16 April 2021, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

In this essay we argue that the expectation that mathematics can serve as a universal foundation and conceptual framework for communication can be based on some implicit anthropocentric assumptions. In our view, the formation of foundations of mathematical thinking, including arithmetic and geometry can be determined to a large extent if not entirely, by the environment and the means of perception and processing of the sensory information about it, and for these reasons can be species-dependent and to a large degree, specific. The conclusion of this analysis is a form of semantic relativism in communication: that no absolute and universal frame of reference may exist for species attempting communication; and therefore, the success of such attempts is determined by finding or establishing a common conceptual frame of reference that is relative to them and specific to them.

Keywords

Mathematics
Semanitcs
Intelligent Systems

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.