Voice parade parameters: Investigating the effect of parade size and voice sample duration on earwitness identification accuracy.

15 June 2021, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

A voice parade enables collection of earwitness identification evidence, but the current procedure is costly and time-consuming. Hence, this study investigates whether the number of foils or duration of samples could safely be reduced. Listeners attempted to recognize a voice amongst same-accented foils in target-absent or target-present parades (constructed as per Home Office guidelines, 2003). Six male English speakers were chosen as targets; three SSBE, and one each from York, Bradford and Wakefield. Listeners were exposed to one target for 60s, before hearing a parade of nine voices (Experiment 1) or six voices (Experiment 2) in either 15s, 30s or 60s samples. Overall performance was low, but higher in target-present versus target-absent. Performance also varied by target-speaker. Results suggest samples can safely be reduced from 60s to between 15s and 30s, but parade size should remain at nine-person.

Keywords

earwitness evidence
voice parade
voice line-up
sample duration
parade size
earwitness identification
forensic speech science
forensic linguistics

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.