An Assessment of methods and techniques used in Forensic Linguistics

31 December 2021, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

The following paper aimed to evaluate the techniques and methods adopted in forensic linguistics. The paper is divided to 5 sections the first section discussed a brief background of the topic while the second chapter aimed to review literature from previous studies. The third section depicted the methods and techniques incorporated in carrying out this research. The fourth section analysed the data gathered for this paper while the last section concluded the paper. It is seen in this research that Courtroom speech, courtroom translation and interpretation, comprehensibility of texts and legal documents, including police cautions issued to offenders or suspects, and the use of linguistic evidence in court procedures are all part of forensic linguistics.

Keywords

forensic linguistics
Authorship Analysis
Sociolinguistic profiling
Forensic phonetics

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Диана Дмитриева: Dec 06, 2025, 15:20

Статья рассказывает, какие методы используют в судебной лингвистике и зачем они нужны. Она показывает, что такие техники, как анализ авторства, анализ речи, профилирование автора и сравнение голосов, действительно помогают полиции и судам разбираться в сложных делах . Сильная сторона работы — много примеров, где лингвисты помогли раскрыть преступления или опровергнуть обвинения. Но автор также честно пишет о проблемах: ошибки экспертов, отсутствие единых стандартов и то, что некоторые технологии (например, анализ голоса) пока недостаточно точные. В целом статья полезная, потому что понятно объясняет возможности и ограничения судебной лингвистики.