Abstract
Steelmaking is a major source of difficult-to-abate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Here, we analyze decarbonization pathways for both aluminum and steel by considering five production routes, including the fossil fuel-based processes that are used today and fully-electrified processes under development. We find that on a $/t CO2 basis, aluminum is cheaper to decarbonize than steel over a wide range of projected electricity costs and carbon intensities. Projections for the year 2050 suggest aluminum abatement costs of $9/t CO2 and steel abatement costs of $363/t CO2 by electrification. Furthermore, we observe that if renewable electricity costs decrease enough for green steel to compete with conventional steel, aluminum may be a cost-effective substitute in many applications. Thus, in contrast to the dominant theory of change, an important option for reducing steel emissions may be substitution with low-carbon aluminum.



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)