Abstract
This paper explores the complex intersection of juvenile justice and mental health within the Indian legal framework, critically analyzing the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 and the POCSO Act, 2012. It examines how adolescent neurodevelopment affects culpability and argues against punitive legal responses, particularly the adult trial of juveniles. Drawing from Indian and international jurisprudence, empirical data, and comparative models, the paper highlights the mental health vulnerabilities of juveniles in conflict with the law. It advocates for a rehabilitative, evidence-based justice system rooted in restorative practices, standardized psychological assessments, and legislative reforms to better balance accountability with mental health and developmental considerations.



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)