THE EVOLUTION OF CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW - SAFEGUARDING BUYERS’ LEGAL RIGHTS FOR SALE OF GOODS CONTRACT

30 August 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This research article intends to explores the development of consumer rights in English law, focusing on how protections for buyers in the sale of goods have evolved over time. Starting with the doctrine of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware), it examines the gradual recognition of implied warranties of quality, especially during the Industrial Revolution when markets and goods became more complex. Key case laws like Chandelor v. Lopus, Parkinson v. Lee, and Jones v. Bright are analyzed to show how common law principles helped shape modern consumer protection laws. The article also discusses why courts were hesitant to impose quality obligations in certain contexts, like horse sales, where trade practices already addressed such issues. However, as goods and markets grew more diverse, stronger protections were needed to ensure fairness for buyers. This led to important statutory reforms in UK, including the Consumer Rights Act (CRA) 2015. The CRA consolidated multiple older laws into one framework, simplifying rules and extending protections to digital content—a vital update for today’s digital economy. This study evaluates how the CRA addresses gaps in previous laws, protects consumers better, and improves confidence in trade. The research findings through this article show that while the CRA has modernized consumer rights, the fast-changing nature of goods and markets means further legal updates will be necessary. Ensuring consumer trust and market stability will require continuous adaptation of the law to meet new challenges in an increasingly digital world.

Keywords

Consumer Protection
Buyer’s Rights
Sales of Goods
Legal Remedies
Breach of Contract
Digital Content

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.