ADS Safety Validation Based on Human Accidents and Conflicts

16 September 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Autonomous driving technology has seen significant advancements in recent years, yet safety and reliability remain major barriers to large-scale deployment. Traditional testing methods rely heavily on mileage accumulation and synthetic simulation, which fail to capture the rare but critical human errors that lead to real-world accidents. This paper proposes a testing and validation framework driven by the analysis of human-related accidents and conflicts. By integrating accident causality modeling, near-miss scenario mining, and behavior-driven simulation, the framework aims to construct high-risk, high-value testing scenarios that accelerate the safety verification process of autonomous vehicles (AVs).

Keywords

Accident
Traffic flow
ADS

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.