Abstract
Autonomous driving technology has seen significant advancements in recent years, yet safety and reliability remain major barriers to large-scale deployment. Traditional testing methods rely heavily on mileage accumulation and synthetic simulation, which fail to capture the rare but critical human errors that lead to real-world accidents. This paper proposes a testing and validation framework driven by the analysis of human-related accidents and conflicts. By integrating accident causality modeling, near-miss scenario mining, and behavior-driven simulation, the framework aims to construct high-risk, high-value testing scenarios that accelerate the safety verification process of autonomous vehicles (AVs).



![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)