Balancing Accuracy and Efficiency in Density Functional Theory Studies of SiO₂ Polymorphs

08 October 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

The ability of dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) calculations to reproduce framework densities and relative stabilities of silica polymorphs has been the subject of a number of prior investigations. Most of these studies either considered only a limited number of DFT approaches or included relatively few structures in the validation against experimental data. Using the Gaussian and plane wave DFT code CP2K, this work aims at a more comprehensive assessment, comparing 27 semilocal approaches that include dispersion interactions either by means of a pairwise correction ("Grimme-type" D3) or in the framework of a nonlocal density functional. The set of silica polymorphs encompasses three minerals and 16 all-silica zeolites. For those approaches that perform well with a moderately sized (triple-zeta) basis set, the effect of adding additional basis functions is evaluated. This (slightly) improves the performance in the majority of cases, especially for relative energies. All in all, those functionals that deliver best agreement with experiment achieve overall errors (as expressed by the mean unsigned error) on the order of 0.2 T atoms per 1000 ų for framework densities and of 1.0 kJ mol⁻¹ (per SiO₂ formula unit) for relative energies. Due to the favourable scaling behaviour of CP2K, structure optimisations of complex zeolites structures are routinely feasible. This is demonstrated through additional calculations for three recently reported all-silica zeolites with extra-large pores.

Keywords

density functional theory
zeolites
thermochemistry
minerals
benchmarking

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information PDF
Description
Additional figures: S1: Comparison of zero-damping and Becke-Johnson damping; S2: Comparison of m-TZVP and m-TZV2PX basis sets; S3: Extra-large pore zeolites: m-TZVP basis sets and tables: S1: Experimental framework densities at different temperatures; S2 and S3: Si–O distances andSi–O–Si angles in α-quartz and α-cristobalite.
Actions
Title
Supporting Information EXCEL
Description
EXCEL datasheets with results for individual functionals
Actions
Title
Archive of DFT-optimised structures
Description
DFT-optimised structures in PDB format
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.