A Data-Driven Framework for Urban Heat Vulnerability Modelling and Intervention Planning

28 October 2025, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Urban Heat Islands (UHIs) intensify the risks of extreme heat in urban environments, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. While their impacts have been widely studied in major cities, medium-sized UK towns remain underrepresented in vulnerability assessments. This project develops a data-driven framework to map and mitigate UHI vulnerability in such towns, with Luton and Oxford as case studies. Using satellite-derived surface temperature data, socioeconomic indicators such as deprivation, and land cover information, a novel urban heat vulnerability index was constructed through a factor analysis. Gaussian-weighted spatial sampling and deprivation metrics provided a nuanced insight into localised and granular human exposure. Thermodynamic simulations of roofing materials further evaluated cost-effective surface interventions. Results revealed significant spatial variation in heat exposure and vulnerability, with deprived and densely populated areas clearly being disproportionately affected. The framework enables targeted urban planning responses such as greening strategies, and is designed to be scalable across the UK and internationally. This study highlights the importance of integrating environmental, demographic and material factors into local climate adaptation strategies, and proposes a pathway toward nationwide resilience planning informed by data-driven, spatial diagnostics.

Keywords

Urban Heat Island
Climate adaptation
Spatial analysis
Heat vulnerability
Urban planning

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Vladislav Kuchumov: Dec 07, 2025, 19:01

Method: Integrates satellite-derived surface temperature, land cover, deprivation, and population density. Uses Factor Analysis to create a composite vulnerability index; includes Gaussian-weighted spatial sampling and thermodynamic simulations of roofing materials. Key Findings: Identifies vulnerable hotspots where high heat overlaps with deprived, dense populations. Shows spatial variability; successfully distinguishes raw heat exposure from human risk. Simulations identify cost-effective materials (e.g., cool roof paint). Implications: Provides a tool for targeted urban planning (greening, cool surfaces). Highlights need for integrated environmental/social data in climate adaptation. Limitations: Relies on surface (not air) temperature; census data lags; model is a snapshot. Outlook: Scalable framework for local policy; suggests dashboard development and AI integration for future planning.