The possibility and impossibility of computing meaning

27 January 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Past work has shown that many aspects of natural language semantics can be modelled using tools from logic and probability theory. I will first discuss how it is possible to train such a model in practice on various kinds of data, and how the probabilistic logical structure of the model is important for generalisation. Turning to the future, I will take stock of the bigger picture, and explain why it is (unfortunately) impossible for such a model to satisfy all the properties we might ideally expect, including computational tractability and logical/probabilistic coherence. I will sketch a new approach to probabilistic modelling, which maintains tractability by relaxing the strict demands of Bayesian inference. This has the potential to explain how patterns of language use arise as a result of computationally constrained minds interacting with a computationally demanding world.

Keywords

Computational Semantics
Cognitive Science

Video

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.