Robots in Disguise

20 March 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

The proliferation and public fascination for large language models (LLMs) using natural language understanding (NLU) have upended corporate investment, labor dynamics, and reinvigorated the term artificial intelligence (AI) as a paragon of progress. However, the rush to immerse AI into digital daily life has overshadowed critical considerations of leveraging human social tendencies to scale product engagement. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI or GAI), finely tuned to engage in conversational communication, and designed to mimic human engagement, obfuscates the distinction between human and machine; misguiding rational users. This issue is more pronounced when GAI addresses sensitive questions that require accuracy, expertise, and empathy–raising GAI's ethical responsibility to moral literacy. In this paper, I will emphasize the need for generative AI to disclose their limitations in greater detail, disclose inequality perpetuated by paid-tier systems, direct users to credible organizations and professionals for support, and abide by a transparent code of conduct.

Keywords

artificial intelligence

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.