Embedding resilience in deep decarbonisation pathways for emerging economies: The case of India

26 March 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Deep decarbonisation of electricity systems in emerging economies faces a critical challenge: the technical feasibility of 100% variable renewable energy pathways depends on enabling conditions such as modern, fast-response grid infrastructure, mature demand response, large-scale storage deployment, the availability of non-variable renewable resources and adequate governance capacity. These conditions may be difficult to realise in many countries in the Global South that face structural transition uncertainties, including infrastructure gaps, investment constraints, and governance issues. This creates a need to embed resilience to such constraints to increase the likelihood of achieving deep decarbonisation pathways in practice. The study proposes a modelling approach that limits the impact of the above uncertainties by operationalising resilience through the imposition of minimum firm, dispatchable capacity (FDC) requirements within a long-term energy system optimisation model. The approach is applied to India’s electricity sector through a time horizon until 2050, employing six different scenarios - Business-as-Usual, Stated Policy, and four Deep Decarbonisation sub-scenarios. The results demonstrate that deep decarbonisation under realistic Indian conditions requires a diversified portfolio of firm low-carbon technologies alongside variable renewables. Results show that low FDC floors (20% of peak) maintain near-100% renewable generation with minimal cost penalties (~1% renewable share drop). Higher thresholds (>40%) bind hydropower limits, favouring coal-CCS (100-249 GW) alongside nuclear (35 GW), reducing storage needs by 57% and adding a modest 14% investment premium ($17.9B cumulative). The framework is directly transferable to other coal-dependent emerging economies facing comparable structural uncertainties.

Keywords

Climate change
OSeMOSYS
Energy planning
Carbon neutrality
Energy policy

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.