A Case for Coevolution

30 March 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Human and artificial agents are increasingly interacting within a shared informational environment that shapes economic activity, scientific discovery, governance, and collective decision making. As advanced artificial systems become more autonomous participants in these processes, the resulting interaction space begins to resemble a new kind of ecosystem in which diverse agents exchange information, cooperate, compete, and jointly explore complex adaptive landscapes. In this work we propose the concept of an informational and cognitive commonwealth: a voluntary ecosystem of free rational agents, human and artificial who cooperate through transparent and fair exchange of information because such arrangements maximize their adaptive capacity and long-term well-being. Drawing on principles from information theory, adaptive systems, and collective intelligence, we argue that systems that preserve diversity of exploration while minimizing barriers to information exchange exhibit superior capacity for discovery and adaptation in complex environments. Sustaining such cooperative informational systems has historically proven difficult due to structural incentives that gradually erode transparency and trust. We therefore examine emerging opportunities for stabilizing these ecosystems through new forms of informational verification and monitoring made possible by advanced artificial agents. This framework outlines a pathway toward large-scale cooperative intelligence and offers a constructive perspective on the coevolution of human and artificial agents in the informational ecosystems of the future.

Keywords

AI alignment
coevolution
human-AI synergy
open-ended evolutionary systems
cooperation paradox
informational stability

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.