Psychology and the Fragility of Nuclear Deterrence

04 April 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Nuclear deterrence is often treated as stable. In practice, it is conditionally stable and cognitively bounded. Under acute stress, decision-making degrades: attention narrows, uncertainty intensifies, and time pressure increases reliance on heuristics. We formalize a distortion function in which stress, bias, and loss sensitivity elevate perceptual and inferential error, while decision time mitigates it. Contemporary military systems compress decision time, increasing the likelihood that distortion exceeds a critical threshold. Deterrence persists only while this threshold is not crossed.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.