PREDICTIONS REGARDING THE USE OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE FOLLOWING THE THIRD WORLD WAR THEORY

06 April 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

In the aftermath of big international crises, it is customary to reassess and modify the methods that are used in the instruction of foreign languages. The strategies used in the aftermath of WWII and other wars demonstrate that language training has broader benefits than just improving communication. It may help with rebuilding, increase security, and foster reconciliation, among other things. In order to foretell the potential role of English as a foreign language after a hypothetical third world war, this study meticulously examines historical evidence. There are similarities between Germany, Korea, Bosnia, and Afghanistan in terms of the development of curricula, the training of teachers, and the policies that govern the country. Although English will remain crucial for worldwide communication, its usage may face more scrutiny owing to cultural autonomy.

Keywords

Prioritizing teacher development
incorporating peace-oriented material into curriculum
incorporating symbolic elements into language selection
enhancing institutional capacity
integrating technology while taking equity into account
historical comparative of theoretical view

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.