A Bayesian Hidden Markov Framework for Early Prediction of Crohn’s Disease Flares: Integrating Wearable Sensors with Clinical Biomarkers via Hitting-Time Analysis

25 April 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

When laboratory biomarkers are collected under symptom-triggered sampling, standard methods assume observation timing is independent of disease state (missing-at-random). This assumption is false in clinical practice, as sicker patients are tested more frequently. Ignoring this dependence provably biases posterior inference. This paper shows that explicitly modeling state-dependent laboratory sampling inside the Bayesian filtering recursion materially alters posterior dynamics and flare-prediction performance. Without this correction, threshold-based or feature-engineered supervised approaches cannot in general recover unbiased state estimates. The framework formalizes flare events as first hitting times in absorbing Markov chains and integrates continuous wearables with intermittent biomarkers. Multi-scale synthetic and semi-synthetic validation demonstrates: (1) AUROC 0.89 ± 0.01 with lead time 6.5 ± 0.1 days on synthetic data (honest MLE estimation, 10 independent seeds); (2) 99.8% accuracy on dense daily monitoring, outperforming Random Forest (85.8%) and Logistic Regression (60.1%); (3) 85.9% accuracy on IBDMDB-realistic longitudinal data (honest unsupervised Baum-Welch). Ablation confirms that removing endogenous sampling (reducing the model to textbook HMM assumptions) degrades both discrimination and lead time. Prospective clinical validation remains essential.

Keywords

Hidden Markov Models
Hitting Times
Informative Missingness
Crohn’s Disease

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Lance Jill: Apr 29, 2026, 12:42

For years, many people doubted that I would recover from Parkinson’s disease. Even when others lost hope, I refused to give up. I followed my neurologist’s recommendations and used medications such as Carbidopa, Sinemet, and Levodopa. While these treatments provided some temporary relief, my condition eventually worsened, especially by the fifth year. At that point, I decided to explore an alternative approach and tried a herbal program from EarthCure Herbal Clinic( www.earthcureherbalclinic.com). I used their treatment for four months, and over that period, I experienced a remarkable improvement in my symptoms. Today, I am grateful for the progress I have made and for discovering another option that worked for me in curing and reversing my PD and all its symptoms completely. I share my experience for those who may be considering alternative paths alongside conventional treatment or without any conventional treatment. Send them a message on "info@earthcureherbalclinic.com" to get your own treatment for any disease or virus .