![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png){kind=logo}
Abstract
On the back of countless warnings that the scholarly system is seriously being threatened, indeed, upended by fraud, fakery and numerous bad practices, we set out establish the extent to which this is true by asking the people who are, arguably, in the best position to know - early career researchers (ECRs). This is because they are research workhorses operating very much at the frontline of research, there are around a million of them and they represent the future. To this end a convenience sample of 62 international ECRs from several disciplines were depth-interviewed about bad and questionable practices and such like. An extensive literature review was also conducted to provide a broader context for and an expansion of the interview data. It was found that the system is not totally broken, but breaking it certainly is. It is under pressure and changes, such as whitelists, local journals, national boards/policies are all slow to come about whilst the fakers can work very quickly.
